It is BUNK to say that 'All' in 2 Peter 3:9 Means 'Some of All Sorts'

Mark Kielar should ask lanech, or Lane Chaplin, to take down certain videos. I produced this video to combat some bunk that I found on Youtube. It is bunk to say that 'all' in 2 Peter 3:9 means 'some of all sorts.' Don't twist the Bible to support your theology! "Bunk" is something that is plausible but erroneous. The following are both the title and link to one offending video that is addressed in this video: "He's Not Willing That ANY Should Perish. ANY of WHOM?", http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A5A8XBRVbw

I hope this video will correct some false understandings which may exist among certain Calvinists and or noncalvinists who may or may not follow: lanech - or Lane Chaplin, Mark Kielar, James White - or droakley1689, John MacArthur, R.C. Sproul, John Piper, C. H. Spurgeon, Paul Washer, or John Calvin.

I believe that Calvinism is a heretical system of belief. I hope that people who follow the heresies it expounds repent!

I hope that Mark Kielar repents from, falsely, using James Strong's name to push his heretical and just plain dumb view that the word "pas" can mean; some of all sorts. Moreover, I hope that Mark Kielar, or Crosstv, or WHOEVER owns the rights to the original video cease from distributing it.

Category:

Music

Tags:

• Calvinism
• calvinist
• calvinistic
• mark kielar
• peter
• 3:9
• 2 peter 3:9
• james white
• john piper
• john macarthur
• r.c. sproul
• arminian
• spurgeon
• bunk
• repent
• total depravity
• heresy
• heretic
• jeremy huckins
• kerrigan skelly
• jesse morrell
• preaching
• preacher
• bible
• droakley1689
• lanech
• lane chaplain
• limited atonement
• particular redemtion
• truth
• particular redemption
• elect
• election
• john calvin
• doctrines of grace
• unconditional election
• tulip
• t.u.l.i.p.
• five point
• deceive
• all
• lie

[sambackues]

As I review some of your statements, you have denied the Gospel. You are teaching salvation by works, or by human effort.

[JeremyHuckins]

@sambackues Salvation was provided for all men by the grace of God, but if a person doesn't believe it then they will not be saved. I received the Holy Spirit after I was saved. He didn't come with Jibbering, but visions, and sensations, and knowledge. I am not denying the Gospel that I believed the day I believed. I don't serve a false humility by saying that, "It wasn't me that believed." I BELIEVED the gospel, and It has been counted to me for righteousness, not the works of the law.

[theearstohear]

Longsuffering to "usward". "Usward" is who Peter is referencing. II Peter 1:1 tells us who Peter is addressing "to them that have obtained a like precious faith with us." He's talking to believers. It follows that "usward" and the subsequent "all" are in reference to the elect who will eventually be saved. This is discussed in greater detail in Office Theology 109 - II Peter 3:9.

[JeremyHuckins]

@theearstohear "Office theology 109 - II Peter 3:9" Shows how someone manipulated 2 Peter 3:15 in order to suit a flawed theology. 2 Pet 3:15 actually says, "And account [that] the longsuffering of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;" And I don't have to crop the verse in order to suit my faith. "AND ACCOUNT..." Believers are to account the Lord's longsuffering-salvation. Doesn't mean that it MUST save.

[sambackues]

I agree skies vibrant. The key is WHO Peter is writing to, that is the elect. That says very clearly the correct context, and makes good sense with the rest of Scripture, especially John 6, with Jesus saying that none will be lost.

[JeremyHuckins]

@sambackues Moreover, John 17:12 says, "While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled." Judas was lost. Judas is representative of those 'sons of perdition' that fail. John 6:39 simply states that it is not the Father's will that Jesus loose one, but he has surely denied that disciple Judas. People deny Jesus by their works. See: Titus 1:16!

[CBALLEN]

2 Peter 3:9 is like someone telling their family(in Peter's case,the BELOVED) that " I've cooked for you all because I want to make sure everyone gets something to eat,I don't want anyone going hungry".The person cooking is speaking to the family,wanting all the family to get something to eat,they're no saying they are cooking or wanting everyone in the world to come and eat.Peter was making it clear that Jesus would only return when God's elect were all born and converted,& then the fireworks.

[CBALLEN]

Even in Arminian thinking,God knows all things.He knew both finite groups of people,the saved and the lost before time began.So if you think 2Peter 3:9 means every person head for head it makes no sense.Arminianism is teaching that God is patiently waiting for people to come and be saved that God knew before time NEVER WOULD,this makes God senile.2 Peter 3:9 is Peter speaking to the beloved about all the BELOVED that God chose to save.God is waiting for all His elect to be born &converted.

[theearstohear]

@JeremyHuckins - And therein lies the difference. You believe that Christ died for people who will still end up in hell. I believe that Christ died for a people that will NEVER end up in hell (John 10:28). You believe that Christ died to make salvation a possible. I believe Christ died to make salvation actual. (Heb 10:14) You believe God requires the obedience of two for salvation. I believe that "by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." (Rom 5:19)

[sambackues]

John 6 clearly refers to the elect, meaning that none of the elect will be lost, because they are God's flock. The rest, like Judas will be lost. Scripture shows pretty clearly that Judas was not of the elect. I would recommend that folks study Scripture carefully on this subject. We are saved by grace, and not of our own will or works. To say free will determines our destiny is to be in the sin of pride, thinking that you are better than those that don't believe. It is totally God's gift.

[JeremyHuckins]

@sambackues Can't someone write to a particular person or group of people and then make an all encompassing statement to all whom repentance is still a possibility-Of course they can, and that was done in 2 Pet. 3:9. In the video I made my "2 peter 3:9" video to counter, Kielar makes your argument and than goes further on to the point I especially targeted in the video I made. I believe the "who's the audience" argument is rot. Every line in the epistle was not referencing the audience.

[JeremyHuckins]

@theearstohear Can't someone write to a particular person or group of people and then make an all encompassing statement to all whom repentance is still a possibility-Of course they can, and that was done in 2 Pet. 3:9. In the video I made my "2 peter 3:9" video to counter, Kielar makes your argument and than goes further on to the point I especially targeted in the video I made. I believe the "who's the audience" argument is rot. Every line in the epistle was not referencing the audience.