Respectable Conservatives and Liberals - Is this Wrong?

Is this wrong?


Honors for this video
#6 - Most Discussed (Today)) - Australia
#1 - Most Discussed (Today)) - News & Politics - Australia
#11 - Most Discussed (Today)) - News & Politics
#25 - Top Favorited (Today)) - Australia
#1 - Top Favorited (Today)) - News & Politics - Australia
#49 - Top Favorited (Today)) - News & Politics
#49 - Top Rated (Today)) - Australia
#1 - Top Rated (Today)) - News & Politics - Australia
#11 - Top Rated (This Week)) - News & Politics - Australia

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• rush limbaugh
• glenn beck
• ron paul
• conservative
• liberal
• neocon
• tea party
• communist
• marxism
• immigration
• borders

[SnugglePuma]

Dumb ass, no one is oppressing white people...

[bombkangaroo]

@garadan

Race is a biological reality. We know this because the study of genetics, psychometrics, neuroscience, etc, etc, tell us so. The scientific method and the information it provides us is only incorrect in the political sense. Race denial is a political position, not a scientific one.

Race is, was, and forever shall remain a valid taxanomical category, and is applicable to modern homo sapiens.

[garadan]

@bombkangaroo Race is not a biological reality, you are likely to have relatives from Japan to Irelandf, from South Africa to Norway, Race was a tidy way to justify that Europeans with more advanced than other parts of the world and therefore made them feel better about exploiting and enslaving large portions of it from the 1600 till pretty much now.

[bombkangaroo]

@TheManWhoSpoke

Actually there's not so much a fine line as there is a gaping chasm. Multicult (on paper) is having several distinct cultures existing side by side. Assimilation is the destruction of those cultures and the transformation of an area into being culturally homogenous.

[bombkangaroo]

@arthurude1

>Well, taking the term "white" as an outdated word for caucasoid peoples,

If you get silly conclusions it's worth re-examining your premises. Clearly middle-eastern Arabs, and Indian sub-cons are not White. White refers to White Europeans, as it has always done, who are a tiny minority globally, making up just 8% of the global population. While many prosperous countries are primarily White, we are rapidly approaching minoritisation in our homelands, and not by accident.

[arthurude1]

@dungeoncrawler55 Well, if you point out those descendents of black slavers then do tell me. Their government doesn't want to help them but i'm feeling pretty generous.

[arthurude1]

@bombkangaroo

>Exterminating "Whites"

Well, taking the term "white" as an outdated word for caucasoid peoples, i think something like "exterminating whites" seems not only impossible but absurd. Who would want to destroy the caucasoid peoples who inhabit from British Columbia to Estern China and Australia? Most of the relevant nations in the world are mostly racially Caucasoid (with the exception of Japan and China) and it is the largest ethnical group in the world.

[bombkangaroo]

@AlexanderDina

Don't forget ethnically cleansing Whites in Haiti aswell.

[bombkangaroo]

@arthurude1

Wrong, race is a biological reality.

Social constructivists try to deny and minimise racial differences, because creating the perception that "race is only skin deep" makes people less inclined to worry about the survival of their people. Such a position is inherently anti-White, and part of an ideology aimed at exterminating Whites off of the face of the planet.

[bombkangaroo]

@ceenahoo

You mean you're mad the the curtain has fallen, the wizard is exposed. We see the emperor's nudity for what it is. Find me an "anti-racist" who is genuinely pro-White; just one, who is demonstrably so, who works for the betterment of White peoples, for the restoration of our homelands to being overwhelmingly White, to prevent our minoritisation and eventual extinction. You can't, because "anti-racist" means being opposed to those things, anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.