Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

John Searle on Ludwig Wittgenstein: Section 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
39,829
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 17, 2008

I'm not sure why there is a skip at 5:30, I'll have to check the source video...

Bryan Magee talks to John Searle about the legacy of Ludwig Wittgenstein; ranging from his early work, the Tractatus, to his posthumously published, Philosophical Investigations.

Section 1:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=qrmPq8pzG9Q

Section 2:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=kl-iLxleHaw

Section 3:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cjZBNDW7DmQ

Section 4:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lGfHQzOzp9s

Section 5:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=p4q0ntDIQBw

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Interesting... the video series started out with 16 thousand plus view (when I posted), and on the third video of the series, less then a third of the viewers remain... Sorry guys, philosophy does not have gunflinging and bullet spraying to keep your attention...

  • Language is a game. let's play !

see all

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wait, question: if i had never experienced language (say i was shut off from society for my entire life) and I saw a flower that was red and yellow would I be able to tell that it consisted of two colors? wouldn't I need some sort of private language to make the distinction between the two colors (say, this one is "this" and the other is "that")? Further, would i be able to make some sort of judgment about the character of the colors that would allow me to see them as separate, without language?

  • @cikcikosman I wish Christopher Hitchens and Wittgenstein had had a debate on God. Hitchens, the consummate wordsmith, may have crapped his pants in "flustration."

  • @InfectedDaemon I think a lot of the people who left did so because they were actually looking for videos on ludes, wigs, wit, steins, and gen. Y

  • @Maartenn100 And he would readily admit that - but how the hell else could he describe them - that's his whole point!

  • "It is ridicilous that we should take religious utterances as second rate scientific utterences". I love that.

  • @philosophyteacher

    Bang on!

  • Wittgenstein himself uses words to talk about 'languagegames'.

    He is contradicting himelf by using words and language.

  • Wow it's amazing to see Searle talk about the private language argument. Searle's chinese room thought experiment is quite brilliant.

  • What a sweaty man.

    He's excited.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more