John Searle on Ludwig Wittgenstein: Section 3
Top Comments
All Comments (73)
-
wait, question: if i had never experienced language (say i was shut off from society for my entire life) and I saw a flower that was red and yellow would I be able to tell that it consisted of two colors? wouldn't I need some sort of private language to make the distinction between the two colors (say, this one is "this" and the other is "that")? Further, would i be able to make some sort of judgment about the character of the colors that would allow me to see them as separate, without language?
-
@cikcikosman I wish Christopher Hitchens and Wittgenstein had had a debate on God. Hitchens, the consummate wordsmith, may have crapped his pants in "flustration."
-
@InfectedDaemon I think a lot of the people who left did so because they were actually looking for videos on ludes, wigs, wit, steins, and gen. Y
-
@Maartenn100 And he would readily admit that - but how the hell else could he describe them - that's his whole point!
-
"It is ridicilous that we should take religious utterances as second rate scientific utterences". I love that.
-
Bang on!
-
Wittgenstein himself uses words to talk about 'languagegames'.
He is contradicting himelf by using words and language.
-
Wow it's amazing to see Searle talk about the private language argument. Searle's chinese room thought experiment is quite brilliant.
-
What a sweaty man.
He's excited.
Interesting... the video series started out with 16 thousand plus view (when I posted), and on the third video of the series, less then a third of the viewers remain... Sorry guys, philosophy does not have gunflinging and bullet spraying to keep your attention...
InfectedDaemon 3 years ago 27
Language is a game. let's play !
EUROBAS 3 years ago 14