A Conservative's Critique of U.S. Foreign Policy Under Bush
Top Comments
All Comments (77)
-
@jashta1 would like to live in.*
-
@arsalaan86 No, the problem is that those places are completely crazy (by our standards) and agressive in the same time. If we lived in the world where an agressive entity could not affect anyone, then yes, it would be better to leave them alone.
Even though it might be true that they refuse to be the part of the market, a much bigger problem(that affects everyone-including you) is that they all have a vision to fight for a society that none of the people who live in the west to like to live in
-
@worcesterwombat the more obvious the arguments seem, the better they are...he is simply commenting on something that is a great part of what he does... he systematically analyzes and gives logical conclusions on what he thinks should be done, which is a good thing since the world has too many self-righteous people who do not give any ideas of what the problem is nor do they give any solutions, they simply ride on the feelings of the crowds (99% idiots, left-right wing idiots etc.)...
-
@worcesterwombat No, dork, you're the arrogant bullshitter. Ferguson is a genius.
-
@worcesterwombat I have the feeling your an arrogant keyboard warrior/bullshitter. XD
-
he counted the percentages of favorable attitudes in various countries but completely ignored who the people are in the ruling parties & the interests of US corporations in those countries. had iran, n korea, or latin american countries made it easy for the US corporations, US wouldn't have cared much about the 'attitudes' of the host populace.
-
@Arkinight really really......your a fuking moron...typical american......check yourlocal unemployment office idiot
-
@worcesterwombat I disagree... This speech is fairly elementary, in that he simply quotes numbers and statistics and draws, relatively simple and obvious conclusions from them.
Fergie has a few fairly interesting but quite obvious observations; I see he's an "expert" on everything these days...foreign policy, credit crunch....I have the feeling he's an arrogant bullshitter
worcesterwombat 3 years ago 6
That is a non sequitur. No one claims that they are permanent. What IS permanent is chaos, and empires do a
pretty good job of stopping it. You want the world of 1898
1945? That is the ONLY alternative to us. You may claim
otherwise, but history is also our only guide, and hemp-spinning arcologies get crushed pretty fast.
krelllabs 3 years ago 5