Does The Big Bang Have A Beginning Point?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
812 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 20, 2009

When you make a finite measurement of time x length etc., you are actually creating a finite state not an infinite state. It is impossible to regress an infinite amount of finite things, since doing so you are using finite variables, finite measurements, finite partitions, finite dimensions, & finally finite space between two objects. Finite things have a beginning and end, whereas infinite do not. Finite things have a beginning singularity point, and "a second point is required" IN ORDER TO CREATE EXPANSION OF SPACE in between point A & point B, however infinite has NO BEGINNING = A point or END . Infinite entities are not confined by time, dimensions, length/lines via two contact points. So in essence, you cannot use anything that occurred after the Big Bang in order to explain infinite. You cannot traverse an infinite, an infinite number of finite things is a complete contradiction. You can have a theoretical infinite, but once you make a finite measurement of partitions, dimensions, & use finite relative variables, you will realize that there is no actual infinite size al all. When energy moves that creates kinetic energy, so the faster an object moves, the more energy it produces. Therefore, if I am moving fast on a bike, once I push the brakes, the kinetic energy "transforms" to heat via brakes. And then you have potential energy , which can be caused by height, so if I jump off a tree, my potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy as I'm falling. So, what is matter composed of ? Particles. So in order to find out what whether energy is composed of finite properties or infinite properties, we must dig deeper in this matter. Particles are subatomic entities, which can actually fit inside an area smaller than the size of the period at the end of this sentence. The 1st law statees that matter & energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it can only transform, i.e., change fromn one to the other,& this changing process produces a balanced state, which is equivallent to a 'net' of zero,i.e., nothing more & nothing less can be created. Now, we have reached a 'net' of zero, which implies that 'no movment', no increase no decrease, absolutely no more energy or matter can be created since that would require 'additional movement' which equals extra energy, which involves a process via "time x motion" equals extra length therefore extra movement equals extra energy required. Did this transformation process take place witin a finite or an infinite statek, considering it took place prior to the Big Bang? If the transformation & the "expansion process" of the universe can be proven to take place within a finite transition rather than an infinite state, then everything, i.e., the transformation, the expansion, & the material would be confined to a finite beginning state. Now, things against an infinite stte are the following examples, (1) This process could not have occurred within an infinite state, since "motion = movement & movements equals activity, therefore activity 'begins' with a +1 nano second time frame, which equals 'a beginning point." And since a 'line' requires 'two points' & space involved movement via distance 'between two points via objects', then both activities, i.e., transformation exchanged & the expansion of space between two points , are considered finite points since point A..to ..point B, have a beginning point from point A, and also has a second piont via "end" via point B. Remember, you need energy to create 'movement', & energy is a means of expressing how much work you have to do to basically get to something. It also uses finte time x finite length, however infinite has 'no beginnings', therefore no reference point , via Point A, and 'no ends' via Point B. Furthermore, if no points exists at all within an infinite state, no universe can expand within something that 'does not exist via point a and point b, remember, 'speace expands witing two points, not just one such as matter. If 'something' is created from a state of 'nothingess', then that is a violation of the 1st Law Of Thermydynamics. So, what caused the universe into existence from a state of 'nothingness?" Nothingness implies the absence of time, which implies 'zero time.' Something within 'nothingness had to create the first +1 particle. Black holes equals +1 particles, vacuums equals +1 particles, string theories equals +1 particles, and oscillating models etc., all consists of +1 particles. So, if I have an infinite amount of marbles and give you +1 marble, I will still have infinite amount of marbles. Infinite minus 1 equals infinite.The answer outside this universe must be 'infinite-eternal."

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (youVSmee)

  • No answer for its physical existence from within itself, unless it was in fact infintely eternal via absence of time, therefore not confined by historical 1dimensional time x 1dimensional lengths.

    Therefore, no matter how you reduce this physical Universe, it cannot explain its own origin since it is confined by 1 dimensional finite virtual particles.

    The Universe has to find its own existence via explanation 'outside its own existence' i.e. self. 1d time is a measurement of change

  • The Universe is not infintely eternal, therefore, it could not have created itself into existence. Something outside this 'closed system" created this '1 dimensional time x 1 dimensional length' byproduct we call a Universe.

    What is this Universe expanding towards? If virtual particles are the initial source of this 'mass' Universe, which happens to have risen from within a vacuum state, then these particle are 'supposedly" the source of origins.

    What surrounded these V-particles?

  • No answer for its physical existence from within itself, unless it was in fact infintely eternal via absence of time, therefore not confined by historical 1dimensional time x 1dimensional lengths.

    Therefore, no matter how you reduce this physical Universe, it cannot explain its own origin since 'it's is confined by 1 dimensional finite virtual particles.

    Furthermore, it has to find its own existence via explanation 'outside its own existence' i.e. self. 1d time is a measurement of change

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the "singularity" of the Big Bang Theory is pure conjecture. if true, it proves the existence of a point transcending time and space that ultimately proved to be omni potent. Sounds like you just proved god.

  • @youVSmee

    I doubt, when the answer is discovered, it is something "outside of existence". "outside of existence" isn't even a useful term. It's like saying, 200 years ago, when nobody could explain why the sun hadn't burned itself out, that the answer would come from outside of its existence. The answer instead came from within, nuclear fusion.

  • one theory of the inflation was that there was a vacuum that was more dense then our current vacuum. at some point that vacuum begain to shed and our univese grew into the void. well grew into itself i guess.

  • gasp!

    you did so well, up until about 1:17 , you were talking about "nothing", and then you went and put something in the nothing!

    EPIC FAIL!

  • Time is an absolute. It is a period of time between 'two events of time', which requires either two finite points- a length of time, an interval between a beginning state & an infinite state. If you notice , there must be a 'finite state' present in order for 'time' to be measureable.

    A finite singularity point and an infnite state, can also be measured because 'a period of 'time' elapses between two finite objects, or between one finite object which has an immesurable- ending point.

  • If u didn't have Space-Time as a real physical presence, then 'everything would have occurred at the 'same time.'

    You see, "space & time" simultaneously create a distance and a dimension between real events.' So, as "something progrsses forward in time, a distance of time & space are moving forward simultaneously.

    That's why it is impossible for you to create something without using up any real time. That's why energy, matter, time and space expanded simultaneously at the Big Bang.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more