Circumcision - A Nurse's Perspective
Uploader Comments (EnoFrisk)
Top Comments
-
"When you think about it circumcision is really a boy's first sexual experience". Do you really want circumcision to be the first thing that your baby boy experiences with his penis? I know I sure didn't.
Nurse Eunice Ewe, your arguments remind me of the same ones the pro circers use on you tube. You seenm to really get off on circumcision and so do many of them. It's time to talk to Dr. Kutter and tell him to stop doing this and to tell parents the truth about this useless procedure.
-
This video is hilarious and I am a fan. Eunice and the Kutter crew are simply excellent and get the point across. Stop circumcision!!!!
All Comments (75)
-
@seaco2000 it doesn't matter if you agree with them or not, these people love to argue.
-
@SimonDove666 you liar. You've lost a massive amount if you're telling the truth. If you think there's no difference then your entire penis was totally defect right from the outset. Without your FS you can't even masturbate anymore either! The best you can do is manhandle your shaft unless you oil your head & run your hand over it, & if you can stand that you've DEFINITELY lost sensation. I've had mine for 25 years more than you & would miss it DRASTICALLY as it feels ECSTATIC, simply HEAVENLY!!
-
@SimonDove666, since you had a defective or partially dysfunctional foreskin, you are not in a position to recommend or extol circumcision generally. The great majoirty of intact guys have a NORMAL foreskin (not tight), whose removal will reduce sexual pleasure. Foreskin is hightly sensory, sexually functional, and unique tissue. Moreover, it preserves the sensitivity of the glans throughout life.
-
Circumcision is nothing but a fashion that Americs fall into... STUPID
-
@SimonDove666 smells like troll
-
@MrFloatingrock Your comment means nothing here considering that on your channel page you declare in your ABOUT ME:
"Im deliberately acting like a troll on youtube for fun so i sincerely apologize for any negative influence on your day"
Thanks for providing a fine example of the motivation behind your ridiculous comment, troll. If any child actually had the condition you've made up here, not being able to urinate at birth, a far less invasive method would correct that.
-
i am totally for it because i had an infection when i was a baby because my foreskin was impeding my ability to go to pee i could have easily had an infection and died. i was circumcised and my ability to pee and overall heath was drastically improved.
- Loading comment...
Why the hell are people so against circumcision!?...I was circumcised This year and I was 17, I'm now 18...But Circumcision is the best thing that ever happened to me!, alot more better to when I had a foreskin...It's alot more pleasurable during masturbation, not sure about sex, I'm still a virgin..obviously. It's alot more bigger than it was, and it's alot more hygenic, Of course I don't believe that babies should really get it done, only if the Doctors see something wrong with it...
SimonDove666 7 months ago
@SimonDove666 What is so good about less penis? With the moving, erogenous, protective part of your penis gone the glans becomes increasingly diminished over time. While you are young and easily aroused this may not seem like a big deal, but in time...
The big deal is this sexual wound is is usually forced upon children without consent.
Hygienic? What about washing?
Bigger? When you remove part of the whole you have less, how is that bigger?
Why? Peer pressure?
EnoFrisk 7 months ago 7
@EnoFrisk I don't really believe babies should be circumcised, depending on any medical problem which arises, or religious beliefs, I'm against it otherwise.
Again, with some other person who believed that all guys can retract the foreskin and wash the glans, not all guys can do that.
It's bigger, as the foreskin constricted the glans and squashed it down, removing the foreskin released pressure, therefore making i t bigger.
And no MEDICAL REASONS. My foreskin was tight. I was worried.
SimonDove666 7 months ago
@SimonDove666 There are no legitimate reasons for cutting the genitals of children, not even religion. Children almost never have actual problems with their genitals that require immediate surgery.
An adult with a tight foreskin can easily do gentle skin expanding exercises that can easily alleviate this. Surgery should be a last resort. Its too bad in North America many doctors will still recommend circumcision, without offering less invasive solutions.
EnoFrisk 7 months ago 6
@EnoFrisk Well, that's where you need to do research.
Some children do infact have genital problems, which require circumcision. And again not all guys can successfully fully retract their foreskins through these exercises...and in the UK, we do not have steroid creams for it, so yeah...use your brain...not everyone is the same as you...
SimonDove666 7 months ago
@SimonDove666 I've been researching this subject for 18 +years. Children very rarely (almost never) need immediate genital reduction surgery. It's a Bronze Age superstitious sexually abusive ritual forced upon children looking for medical validation that does not exist. The bullshit excuses that quack "doctors" have given for 140+ years to excuse doing this surgical abuse of children's genitals includes everything from alcoholism and bedwetting to leprosy to cancer & AIDS.
EnoFrisk 7 months ago 4