Michael Schumacher onboard at Interlagos 1994

Onboard with Michael Schumacher in the Benetton Ford at the first race of the 1994 season. Was he using illegal driver aids? Decide for yourself

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Michael
• Schumacher
• onboard
• Interlagos
• 1994
• Benetton
• F1
• Grandprix

[Pompyroftw]

You're correct. Senna's widows flood every Schumacher video with their shitty comments that make no sense at all.

[Heskey10]

Mr.Mouth the king of cook sucking

[X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X]

@AhBen567

I don´t think they were THAT silly and made a hearable traction control !

[AhBen567]

I Don't hear any traction control crackling from the car. Jos Verstappen?

[X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X]

@MXB2001

Super-traction-control car control ! Amazing to hear: No "playing" with the throttle, just full throttle with working traction control ...

[ViniciusLimaRS]

Hiper ultra superb control lol

[MXB2001]

Superhuman car control. Amazing to watch.

[phresnel1]

@beebogroll And then, finally, don't forget the myriads of human that never got the chance to drive against Senna, for example because they lived 30000 years ago, or because they die on AIDS long before their 10th birthday. What is better, the Rhinoceros or the Triceratops? The polar bear or the groundhog? Under some circumstances, it is the one, on other, the other.

[phresnel1]

@beebogroll That is exactlly the point. There are no statistics for anything that wasn't measured. So, for example, you can't compare Mark Webber against Ayrton Senna, simply because they drove at different times and different tracks. Possibly Mark Webber is ten times better than Senna. But Statistics don't show it, because Sebastian Vettel is even better. And, mathematically speaking, statistics always measure only a tiny tiny subset of what happens in the world.

[beebogroll]

@phresnel1 how did you figure out that statistics count for tracks that arent built...? statistics are statistics, regardless of what track theyre on.

[phresnel1]

@beebogroll And even if you permute over every race driver on the world, over every race track of the world, there are infinitely many race tracks never built, but which could change statistics. As well as 99.99999999999999999999999% of all humans since homo sapiens never had the chance to race. Statistics are just one of infinitely many possible measures, as are IQ tests or sunday night quiz shows. You see, I admit and like Shueys 7 titles, but they are not THE ONE AND ONLY POSSIBLE TRUTH.

[phresnel1]

@beebogroll No. Nooo. Nooooooo. You can not say by statistics alone who is the absolute best. Has Rindt ever competed Schumacher? Nooooo, he hasn't. Al Unser versus Fangio? Nooooo. It could even be that Nico Rosberg is the second coming of Senna, and Fernando, Sebastian, Jenson, Lewis are even better. Why is that neither provable nor falsifiable? Because they never competed each other. And even if they did, some drivers are good on one set of tracks and fail at others, and vice versa.