Venomfangx 2.0 at it again

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
714 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 16, 2009

Yep.

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (PrometheusWithLight)

  • Considering how weak his video is i think your video actually made his look better. Until about the 2:30 minute mark your points are weak as piss.

    Consider the case where i enter a discussion with you but prefix it with something like "hopefully all americans will be killed soon". Would it be your fault if you decided against talking to me? Er.. No.

    The deforestation bit, sheesh. weak. lets bring out the world smallest violin. What about sharks, they get hunted because of deforestation?

  • I'd actually be more likely to continue the discussion, given the interesting, albeit gruesome, topic. Further, I don't demand that my words be given respect; respect is something to be earned.

    As to deforestation, I was simply showing that such a manner of thinking isn't even applicable literally. He was using the "hunting a dangerous animal" story as an analogy to the death penalty; it'd be trivial to show how ineffective that is.

  • Right which is why disrespecting someone up front is a legitimate reason for you to not pursue a converstation.

    The death penalty is only not effective because you cannot guarantee it being 100% accurate. If you could convict murderers with 100% accuracy of not convicting the innocent, immediately take them to the front of the court and hang them without any 20 years of death row BS. It could be effective. But it is not effective in an imperfect system.

  • But he didn't disrespect him. His name is a legitimate and arguably true point. If Geerup genuinely thought god didn't want blood, instead of getting offended and whining about it, he could have argued the point.

    The death penalty wouldn't be effective, even then. It has no deterrent effect, (actually, it seems to have an incentive effect,) and moreover, killing people for killing people is both hypocritical and uncivilized.

Top Comments

  • Geerup suck, Shawn is a complete douche HOWEVER is was far more fun to laugh at...I say bring him back!

  • I don't get how it's "blasphemous".

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Sweeny Todd was a perfect way to end that... Wow you are amazing... I have stayed up much past my bed time to watch your videos... 5:01 am now o.0

  • Lions, Tigers, & Bears...... Oh my...... ROFL

  • ahhahaah sweeney todd ^_^!

  • I consider cunning to be a good feature. In the same way there's book smarts and there's savant like talent. I figure cunning is a savant like survival trait.

  • That would only get rid of the gullible people. The cunning ignoramus would survive that.

  • If one considers the true biological meaning of race. There's only one race of humans. So genocide against the human race. Well your plan would mean a lot less people all owning really cool tiger rugs. I just like plans where the humans get rid of themselves. Like a building with a big sign that says free money and whenever its full it turns into a giant blender. This means we're getting rid of the dumbest and not just a percentage.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more