Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Netherlands v Scotland - the disallowed goal

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,800
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 28, 2009

Can you spot the infringement at this goal? No! Me neither....the only possible infringement is that Scotland scored and, of course, this does not suit the UEFA agenda.

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (uefamerda)

  • The Scots played as fags, 4-5-1 when being behind 1 and 2-0. Perhaps it was the most wise thing to do because it would otherwise have been 4, 5 or 6 for us, but this style of play is so anti-football. Still, the Scots are my favourites - after obviously we dutch- in this group. They have a great mentality. I once played Glasgow Rangers and lost 2-1, most because of their high moral.

  • And the infringement was.....? Fags???? Surely if we had got one back (which technically we did) in 74 mins, it might have been more interesting .......and the nervous dutch may have had a game on their hands??!!

  • I hear you.. Im just sick of clutching at straws with makeshift scottish teams. anyway, thanks for putting this up.

  • I suppose I was just getting carried away at 0-0 after half an hour and actually playing quite well away from hom against a top side :-( Arjen Robben was outstanding

  • Oh stop Greetin'. We got played off the park. Probably should have been a goal though.

  • I'm not greetin'. We got pumped, but at 2-1 it MAY have been different. That was my point!

Top Comments

  • what about players like mcgeady and mccarthy fukin off to play fur their ancestors country

  • Thats what happens to us Scots , No one likes us , Yet we dont care .

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • so it wouldnt have made a difference scotland are shit lol they still woulda got smashed just means the other team doesnt get a clean sheet

  • Classic example of corrupt refereeing. No-one doubts that the Dutch are better than Scotland, deserved to win and would probably have still won even if this goal had stood.

    But that's not the point.

    The point is that the referee is taking no chances of a result that's not in the script.

    It's important to realise that when tens of millions of euros are gambled on a match, it's not just about who wins. Bets on who scores the next goal, correct score, etc add up to more than bets on who wins.

  • every one loves us apart from england

  • uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

    i don't get it... what exaccccctly happened... i didn't see anything... what the ref saw... eeehhhhhhh... idk : /

  • JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • still wondering wit would hiv happened if tht goal was allowed

  • Nope.

  • Definitely NOT a seelout, I think thats beewn the problem, everyone thought you had to be an offical tartan army member to get a ticket. I know I did till I tried to get tickets last week and there was still thousands to be sold. Still tons of tickets left although the Celtic end (East Stand) should be busier than the Rangers end so I would try and get a ticket there. Looking at your name I'm sure that would have been your first choice anyway. Go to the sfa website for details on how to buy

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more