Argumentum Ad Populum

Website! http://MrMinistryMan.com
Vlog Channel! http://YouTube.com/Mx3vlog
Gaming Channel! http://YouTube.com/Mx3Plays
Shirts! http://MrMinistryMan.spreadshirt.com
Fans! http://facebook.com/MrMinistryMan
Tweets! http://Twitter.com/MrMinistryMan
Questions! http://formspring.me/MrMinistryMan

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• mrministryman
• mr
• ministry
• man
• atheism
• debate
• discussion
• jesus
• church
• faith
• religion
• evidence
• proof
• philosophy
• vlog
• vlogging
• vlogger
• video
• blog
• blogging
• blogger

[ybra]

Btw will we have to wait an other week before you make your next video with an argument for god? Because this video just explaining that you where not making an argument that some people thought you did. And concluded that people should try to make sure that what they believe is actually true, which i think most atheists would agree with.

So will we have to wait a week before we can hear an argument for god? I feel like this video had no real content.

[MrMinistryMan]

@ybra Yea, I was thinking about that too, but honestly with the schedule that I have right now I have NO time between now and next Thursday to really make another video. I will be making a Tuesday video for the Christian crowd because that is what I have promised. I wish I could get something done this weekend but pretty much every minute of my weekend is filled up with other obligations this week.

[nejtilsvampe]

Dude, you DID imply that numbers had something to say in the matter. Call it a variation of Argumentum Ad Populum, but it's still a fallacy.

[alianchild]

It was an Argumentum Ad Populum. Sorry, but you didn't include the full clip that most definitely sneaks it in. Thats a little dishonest. Don't you think?

[CapQuacer]

this is a strawman, because you are compairing it to a matter of opinion, instead of a opinion of fact. An opinion of fact is that you are saying something is real god or invisable unicorn, as where an opinion on phrasing is personal. Some opinions of fact like invisable unicorns are not worth exploring lacking data. God on the other hand is a mass of conflictitor data.

[funkydanieluk]

@alianchild a christian being dishonest? But that would be bearing false witness! No Christian would ever do that...would they?

[Scotterson34]

@VegasTechno Even if 1000 atheists come and tell me there is no god, there will be 1000s of other Christians to back up his belief.

[VegasTechno]

So what you're saying, is if a thousand atheists tell you that God might NOT exist, you might want to look into it a little further and make sure?

[lamface1]

For one thing, Christians only make up 33% of the world. So, if 1 out of every 3 people told you to revise a sentence, it would be slightly different than if everyone did. You could then ask them to explain why. After their explanation, you could say, "Hmm...they make a good point, I'll change it," or you could say, "I don't agree, so I am going to leave it the way it is." I think most atheists DO, in fact, ask Christians to explain why, and they roll their eyes at their explanations.

[JohannMint]

The thing is the unicorn simply isn't there - just like your god. This is not a matter of personal perception. The scientific method has not detected god or unicorns.

[Theduffman4333]

@Yah023weh You are so stupid.

[Yah023weh]

@lulusugar1 Good response. Getting violent over religion.

[Yah023weh]

@Theduffman4333 So everyone should always assume the other person is right?

Come on! You never stood up for something you believed was right?

[Yah023weh]

@ybra Most people do not look into their beliefs.

People spend more time disproving God than they do considering different viewpoints.