@MacHead31, your question is so poorly worded and inarticulate that it is clear you are befuddled. Amost all the pubmed studies on circumcision/HIV are cross-country comparisons.The fact you don't understand this means you have no knowledge of them.
It's funny how you Americans ignorantly vaunt the benefits of circumcision, when the USA, whose adult male population is 80% circumcised, is so rife with EVERY TYPE of STD, having more of them per capita than any other developed nation.
@psandbergnz How does an airborne virus work? You tell me because I am not going to spoon feed you information anymore. What is the difference between a virus that is and one that is not in terms of its geographical location and how they transfer? What will it take to increase the HIV virus in EUR?
Please answer those questions and maybe you will figure it all out.
>The pubmed studies you base your argument on are mostly comparisons between countries<
@MacHead31, what has being "airborne" got to do with it? HIV transfers between body fluids, and that is how we have an HIV pandemic now. HIV is about equally distributed between circumcised and intact (i.e. men with a normal penis) American men.
The pubmed studies you base your argument on are mostly comparisons between countries, i.e. ecological, so you have weakened your own argument, but are too thick to realise it.
@psandbergnz >If circumcision were protective against STDs, it is unlikely that the USA (80% circ'd!) would be so rife with them<
I have answered this 1,000 times already on this one video.
The simple answer is HIV is not airborne so we wouldn't expect to find a correlation among different geographical locations. Go pick up a science book and learn how STDs transfer.
Your like a creationist saying the same bogus claim over and over again: Where are the transitional forms of life from evolution?
@psandbergnz Looks like you have your work cut out for you figuring out what is actually going on around you. Use your brain your an evolved being... You can do it!
@MacHead31, your petty banter only shows up your own ignorance and deficiency in any scientific training. Interesting how you can't directly respond to the questions I posed. If circumcision were protective against STDs (incl. HIV), it is unlikely that the USA (80% circ'd!) would be so rife with them! As the APA (USA) says:
"Among first-world nations, the U.S. continues to have the highest rates of STDs, 10-50 times higher than other first-world nations such as Sweden and France."
@MacHead31, your question is so poorly worded and inarticulate that it is clear you are befuddled. Amost all the pubmed studies on circumcision/HIV are cross-country comparisons.The fact you don't understand this means you have no knowledge of them.
It's funny how you Americans ignorantly vaunt the benefits of circumcision, when the USA, whose adult male population is 80% circumcised, is so rife with EVERY TYPE of STD, having more of them per capita than any other developed nation.
psandbergnz 3 months ago
@MacHead31, yes, indeed HIV is not airborne. And you're an airhead.
Diseases that are airborne don't usually achieve equal global spread either, so what's your point?
psandbergnz 3 months ago
@psandbergnz How does an airborne virus work? You tell me because I am not going to spoon feed you information anymore. What is the difference between a virus that is and one that is not in terms of its geographical location and how they transfer? What will it take to increase the HIV virus in EUR?
Please answer those questions and maybe you will figure it all out.
>The pubmed studies you base your argument on are mostly comparisons between countries<
No it is not.
MacHead31 3 months ago
@MacHead31, what has being "airborne" got to do with it? HIV transfers between body fluids, and that is how we have an HIV pandemic now. HIV is about equally distributed between circumcised and intact (i.e. men with a normal penis) American men.
The pubmed studies you base your argument on are mostly comparisons between countries, i.e. ecological, so you have weakened your own argument, but are too thick to realise it.
psandbergnz 3 months ago
HIV is not AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE, AIRBORNE!!!!
MacHead31 3 months ago
@psandbergnz >If circumcision were protective against STDs, it is unlikely that the USA (80% circ'd!) would be so rife with them<
I have answered this 1,000 times already on this one video.
The simple answer is HIV is not airborne so we wouldn't expect to find a correlation among different geographical locations. Go pick up a science book and learn how STDs transfer.
Your like a creationist saying the same bogus claim over and over again: Where are the transitional forms of life from evolution?
MacHead31 3 months ago
@psandbergnz Looks like you have your work cut out for you figuring out what is actually going on around you. Use your brain your an evolved being... You can do it!
MacHead31 3 months ago
@MacHead31, your petty banter only shows up your own ignorance and deficiency in any scientific training. Interesting how you can't directly respond to the questions I posed. If circumcision were protective against STDs (incl. HIV), it is unlikely that the USA (80% circ'd!) would be so rife with them! As the APA (USA) says:
"Among first-world nations, the U.S. continues to have the highest rates of STDs, 10-50 times higher than other first-world nations such as Sweden and France."
psandbergnz 3 months ago