Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam - Robert Spencer (1 of 4)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
14,571
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 8, 2009

Robert Spencer is a scholar of Islamic history, theology, and law. He is the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of eight books on Islam and jihad. Spencer is a weekly columnist for Human Events and the website Front-Page Magazine, and has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the Joint Terrorism Task Force, and the U.S. intelligence community.

Robert Spencer is the author of two New York Times bestsellers: The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World's Most Intolerant Religion (Regnery) and The Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to Islam (and the Crusades) (Regnery), as well as four other books on Islam and terrorism, including Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions about the World's Fastest Growing Faith (Encounter), and Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad Still Threatens America and the West (Regnery), as well as eight monographs and hundreds of articles. He lives in a secure, undisclosed location.

ooo OOO ooo

FP: Throughout my life in academia, myriad volumes have passed before me that contained criticisms of Christianity, within which there were various mocking and ridiculing portrayals of its tenets and values etc. Your book doesnt mock anything, but just quotes Islamic sources and lets them speak for themselves. I think that it would be essential to have this book as a must-read in the curriculum for every introductory course for first-year students in the Arts in university. Why is it that it is a given that this would never happen? For instance, in many courses where the topic of 9/11 is raised, all kinds of readings are given out that blame the U.S. for being the victim in this terrorist attack. Why wouldnt they at least offer this book as an alternative explanation?

It is a given, of course, that this book would never make it on any curricula readings in academia, even in courses on Islam which profess to give all sides of the picture. Why?

Robert Spencer: Because the academic establishment the Middle East Studies Association is not interested in really giving all sides of the picture. Since the 1970s it has been dominated by Edward Saids view that any critical look at Islam or the Muslim world by Westerners was ipso facto racist and imperialist. This idea has coalesced nicely, of course, with the multiculturalist dogma that the Judeo-Christian West is responsible for all the evils in the world, and that those outside of and set against Western civilization can only be victims, never perpetrators...

Also, it is not unheard-of for outright Islamic apologists to occupy academic positions in American universities, and to present Islamic proselytizing material in academic settings. This is in part a manifestation of the general American ignorance of Islam. Universities hire Muslim professors in order to teach about Islam and the Middle East, and the other professors know so little about the subject that they cannot perform adequate peer review even if their world view would allow them to do so in the first place. The academic establishment has become so politicized that many professors of Middle East Studies are presenting as fact highly tendentious and apologetically motivated assertions about Islamic teachings and history, and their peers either dont know or dont care, or both.

Source and additional information:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=7380

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • This guy should be in the White House.

  • I’ll tell what, You go up to a Christian and tell him you spit on a bible and then go up to a Muslim and say you spit on a Quran and I bet you’ll only have to run from one!

see all

All Comments (245)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Only aggressive cultures survive, and the cultures that have survived today are the most aggressive ones historically. Islam and christianity are much more aggressive than the cultures they destroyed, so they have survived. In the end the worst ideology, the most aggressive, and the most vile culture will survive, but it will look upon itself as the most peaceful, scientific, and beautiful, simply because nothing else will exist at that time. This is humanities fate I think...

  • @AHMEDBULAXUBEY whaaaat :o muslims are not doing wrong? Wtf they cause,all the problems wars terrorism, segregation, they treat anyone whos not muslim, or is a woman or is gay like dirt, and no other religion has genocided as much as islam thr world will be so much bettet when it and all religion is gone.

  • Can this Mather fucker tell us why white men doing in Muslim land Arabs are not doing wrong in the white men lands is your people doing attacks in Muslim land

  • @fromwilliams Anders Breivik also quoted President Kennedy, Mohammed, Martin Luther King to name a few. Read his books, he gives you all the info to check it yourself. I don't wanna argue with you about this because I have found that it goes no where on youtube!!!

  • So his delusions are better than other stupid delusions!

  • @imdb2004 No way dude, I am living in Texas!

  • Lier

  • This guy sucks cock

  • this man is shitting lies i my self a Muslim but it seem to me he talking about another Islam

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more