Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Vanessa Rousso - Game Theory Applied to Poker

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,504
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 7, 2010

Vanessa Rousso, applies game theory to poker.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Bot!!!

  • hot AND smart... holy shit...

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @deepskye don't try to act smart. That too is simple high school prob & stat. It is a logical consequence of the Gauss-curve. The reason why the inequality applies to any large (enough) set of data is more complex though and is a part of proving the Central limit theorem. As with all theoretical concepts though, I think it's not very relevant to poker meta-game, which is much more psychological.

  • ill go with my reads ;)

  • wow she's a genius. no wonder she's the top female poker player in the world.

  • So thats high school statistics. Come back when you're up to chebyshev's inequality

  • @dreamcircus "In the video she basically used a bunch of big words to say absolutely NOTHING at all.. and yet people here think she sounds smart!?!?!? Here's news... Vanessa actually does NOT understand game theory!!!!"

    No... I agree she boasts a little but she IS intelligent.

    Actually you don't get what she is saying because you don't get the big words... She didn't say "NOTHING"

    she explained that you by knowing other players tendency to bluff you can optimize your betting...

  • In the video she basically used a bunch of big words to say absolutely NOTHING at all.. and yet people here think she sounds smart!?!?!? Here's news... Vanessa actually does NOT understand game theory!!!!

  • All she is really saying here is that patterns are quantifiable. No shit. welcome to science. This isn't genius. If player A bluffs 60% of the time in situation B, then the correct long term decision would to be to call them EVERY time.

  • the first few seconds she reminds me of phil laak and antonio ... duke graduate mirroring degenerates ... very classy ....

  • i'd love to fuck her

  • @jc8861 no she's in law school as far as i know

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more