Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Canadian Senate Committees in Action

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,382
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 26, 2008

Copyright of the Senate of Canada's Communications Directorate

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • You see, when people meet to do work they tend to sit down...what do you expect them to be doing? What about their work on Bill C-10, when they poured over 560 pages of legislation - missed by elected members of the Commons, who earn far more money - in order to discover a government attempt at censorship? Please do some research prior to expressing yourself.

  • They don't lose money. They make money but require banks to loan them money for start-up costs, just like any other business does. These loans are often contingent on the tax credits C-10 threatens to undermine.

    People in that industry work hard and earn a good, honest living. The Senate is standing up for them while the Conservative government sits on its hands.

    You seem really closed-minded to me. I feel sorry for you.

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hhaaaa.. what a silly clip !! you should see how these idiots are fighting in Senate like animals and insulting each other..!! hhaaa

  • @atworkguy LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLL­LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL­LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL­LLLLL

  • We need the Senate for oversight. It is obvious that in this country we NEED oversight ... i.e. Sponsorship Scandal, anything Harper and Flaherty do.

  • Screw the appointed Senate. Elect the Canadian Senate like a democratic nation should!

  • I hate to break it to you, but thousands of businesses and industries in Canada receive tax credits or other forms of government assistance, not just the film industry.

    As someone who appears to be free market oriented, I would have thought that you would support reducing taxes, rather than limiting the availability of tax credits. Also, I'm no libertarian but I would rather not have the government decide behind closed doors, with no oversight, what I can and cannot watch!

  • Funding business projects that lose money isn't censorship, it's called making sound decisions. Honestly though, who really cares about the catering people?

    I've begun to realize all the fuss about Bill C-10. The Canadian film industry isn't worried about censorship, they're worried they might actually have to EARN a living just like everyone else! OMG, what has this world come to!?

  • The prevention of 'any' form of expression, you say? I agree, my friend. Bill-10 constitutes effective censorship given the way Canadian films are financed. No tax credit = no bank credit = no production capital = no jobs for hardworking Canadian actors, crews, technicians, catering people, etc. There are good, solid economic reasons for not denying them that should outweigh Conservative ideology. But alas, this is not the case.

  • Denying tax credits is NOT censorship. Censorship is when you prevent somebody from any form of expression. Tax credits aren't a form of expression!

  • Actually, C-10 specifically includes a provision allowing the Minister to deny tax credits to projects that run counter to "public policy". To me, that's censorship, plain and simple. These tax credits help people of all political stripes and allow valuable productions to get loans from banks and thus finance themselves. So yes, it is their own money.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more