Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Analysis of 1973 Thylacine Footage

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
111,314
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 8, 2009

Analysis of the supposed footage of a thylacine taken by a couple in 1973, South Australia.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Nice breakdown of the video. It looks like it probably was a thylacine but the video is nearly 40 years old. We can only hope they are still alive today..

  • @lostmangos Even better...here's a thought...why doesn't someone get a group of trackers with about a dozen bloodhounds or so, give them the scent of a thylacine (we have their hides and bones in museums all over the place, some of them are less than 80 years old), and comb the forests in a grid pattern...if there is ANYTHING there with that scent, bloodhounds would find them (provided the scent is still detectable on the hides).

see all

All Comments (393)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @negrobeater10 U got your opinion and I don't care about it, cause I gott my own ...How there you call me stupid!?? you imbecile you don't even know me!

  • it looks like a kangoroo

  • @pauxecide might aswell give up on searching for that thylacine, for it's probably completely gone by now.

  • @AntarcticW0LF *Cryptozoologists

  • Well... the long tail.. which stays stiff as the creature runs across the road, from the pictures and readings, Thylacines have very long stiff tails. when most animals run, their tail moves with them in a waveing motion, this creatures does not.and if I'm not mistaken... in some parts where the light hits the creatures back, you can see bits and pieces of stripes.... I'm no expert, but I would saw we've got footage of a Thylacine!

  • last pic is of kengur

  • @Mistery371 extremly stupid. first of all the reason they were hunting was because farmers in the 1800s only saw them as usless animals that store the farm animals. if they returned there would be no reason to hunt them + it would go under rare animals list and would not be hunted.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more