Note Romney: Is Pro life look @ his record while he was govenor in Mass.He always voted pro-life in office. He also apolgized for changing his stance on abortion.
lol No. If he says he's personally pro life, meaning he believes that a fetus is "life" then protecting that would seem to be a job of the state.
I never said it WAS or was not life. The point is that if he said he was personally pro life but is "effectively pro choice" than he's being hypocritical. Rhetoric...isn't that what we are both partaking in? God bless.
no there is no scientific patented conclusion on whether it is life or not, leaving it up to personal belief to decide whether its life or not; therefore, not a matter(in his opinion, 12 years ago) for the state to decide whether it is right or not. the state may only remain objective, so that it allows for personal subjectivity.. you like your rhetoric too much.
I disagree. He is saying that I'm personally of the belief that a fetus is "life" and then turning around and letting people take life. That's not the pro choice position at all. That position is that it's a fetus, not a life, just a clump of cells. You're right...it's not hypocritical, If he believes it's LIFE, and then says go ahead and destroy it it's homicidal.
no, even when it comes to life. because it is hypocritical for you to say that you allow me to practice a different religion than you, but then say that i have to share the same abortion belief system as you, just because.. and he said what he was refering to before he was in office, and when he was in he vetoed any abortion legislature.
Fuck you GOPChoice. Romney 2012
malazt 1 year ago
Note Romney: Is Pro life look @ his record while he was govenor in Mass.He always voted pro-life in office. He also apolgized for changing his stance on abortion.
mydodgers1 4 years ago
hahahah
spacekicker 4 years ago
Willard cited his own mother as inspiration for pro-choice views.
Now he throws her under the Winnebago
MKB2814 4 years ago
Abortion is just one of Willard's flip-flops.
18 and counting.
Not only flip-flopping out of opportunism, but doing it state to state.
MKB2814 4 years ago 2
lol No. If he says he's personally pro life, meaning he believes that a fetus is "life" then protecting that would seem to be a job of the state.
I never said it WAS or was not life. The point is that if he said he was personally pro life but is "effectively pro choice" than he's being hypocritical. Rhetoric...isn't that what we are both partaking in? God bless.
spacekicker 4 years ago
no there is no scientific patented conclusion on whether it is life or not, leaving it up to personal belief to decide whether its life or not; therefore, not a matter(in his opinion, 12 years ago) for the state to decide whether it is right or not. the state may only remain objective, so that it allows for personal subjectivity.. you like your rhetoric too much.
keyan99 4 years ago
I disagree. He is saying that I'm personally of the belief that a fetus is "life" and then turning around and letting people take life. That's not the pro choice position at all. That position is that it's a fetus, not a life, just a clump of cells. You're right...it's not hypocritical, If he believes it's LIFE, and then says go ahead and destroy it it's homicidal.
spacekicker 4 years ago
no, even when it comes to life. because it is hypocritical for you to say that you allow me to practice a different religion than you, but then say that i have to share the same abortion belief system as you, just because.. and he said what he was refering to before he was in office, and when he was in he vetoed any abortion legislature.
keyan99 4 years ago
Not when it comes to life. Even last night he said that he was "effectively pro choice". doing nothing is often the same as doing something.
spacekicker 4 years ago