Would it not be better to state that the justification for your use of simulatneous equations is that by equating the formula of each line you express the point of intersection of the lines in an equality, meaning u, in this manner express the coordinates that will satisfy the both equations for x and y 'simultaneously'" - or graphically - that such a solution must necessarily be a point both lines in common pass through on the cartesian plain and thus also ' a point if intersection' "?
Would it not be better to state that the justification for your use of simulatneous equations is that by equating the formula of each line you express the point of intersection of the lines in an equality, meaning u, in this manner express the coordinates that will satisfy the both equations for x and y 'simultaneously'" - or graphically - that such a solution must necessarily be a point both lines in common pass through on the cartesian plain and thus also ' a point if intersection' "?
SensiStarToaster 5 months ago
If M is the point (6; 1) that means your diagram is a bit off right?
SensiStarToaster 5 months ago
South Africa FTW!
SensiStarToaster 5 months ago