Creationism
Uploader Comments (Laestadianinfo)
Top Comments
-
I'll take Answers and Genesis and the Creationist Museum seriously when they cite their sources and make some reproducible experiments showing that the Earth is 6,000 years old and evolution can't happen on a species level. I don't really give a flying fuckstick about Creationist "science" when most of this "science" consists of misrepresenting scattered studies that used radiometric dating.
As far as this video, you shit yourself at about 7:30 and didn't recover. The ending was flat
-
Instead of wasting all that money on building this laughible museum, they could of helped feed the poor.
All Comments (88)
-
@frodowise Have you looked at any scientific developments since about 1903? Do you know about Atomic energy? The atomic bomb? What do you think happens to enriched uranium or plutonium in a reactor? Does E=mc2 mean anything to you? Energy and matter are interchangeable. Matter can certainly be destroyed. None of which has anything to do with an assault on Darwinism, which as others here have pointed out, is about what happened after the earliest form of life appeared on Earth.
-
Always the same boringly ignorant claims...
-
So why does religion try to prove science wrong, lying about the age of the earth?
-
"Religion and science have (not has) different domains"? If that were true, why do religion constantly make scientific claims? That Jesus was born of a virgin is a scientific claim. That Jesus walked on water is a scientific claim. That God can interfere with our world and perform miracles is a scientific claim. The world is scientifically VERY different if the things I mentioned were true.
-
@frodowise#1~ It is the Law of Conservation of Mass:the mass of a closed system will remain constant over time. Your idea is the principle of mass or matter conservation, and it does not hold true under relativistic and quantum conditions. This is cosmology and physics and has nothing to do with evolution in any way...try studying!
-
@frodowise The universe was smaller, but it has been here since the begining of time.
-
Gave it a chance for 50 seconds, until you misused the word science, which does not comment on the supernatural.
-
My life has a lot of meaning and I love it. I've never been religious.,,,But life It's very meaninfull to me. From nanos to the galactical wonders back to ourselves. Our "primate" like beheviour it just soooo beautifull and amazing. I love me and I love my fellow "ape" brothers and sisters. And I also love every living organism on earth. My living Mother earth. We are Celestial dust.
-
OK, so I watched it to the end. Are you truly suggesting that life has no meaning without a creator? How can you justify that?
-
2010 and they're suggesting there were dinosaurs on Noah's Ark? Oh, man, this story just keeps getting better. Just think, in a couple hundred years from now, they'll be pawning off pictures of dinosaurs supposedly taken by cell phone cameras, with Jesus in the background standing on a lake.
Beklager men jeg forstår ikke helt poenget ditt. Kan du forklare til meg hva budskapet i filmen er?
oddsniper 2 years ago
Budskapet i filmen är riktat till kreationister i USA. Jag försöker förklara varför kreationism inte är vetenskap. Filmen är alltså riktad till amerikaner, inte europeer. Det finns just inga kreationister i Europa. Skapelseberättelsen tror man på, men man blandar inte ihop den med vetenskap.
Laestadianinfo 2 years ago