you are right. i make fun of my dad because he has a 1993 GT just like this one. granted it's not stock anymore. but its a little family feud between whos mustang is better. my 2004 GT or his 1993 GT. lol
@charger1970and68 look at the year of the recording dip shit. How many times do you see a foxbody and a third gen camaro on the same street these days in that kind of condition?? Oh, and that was an RS, not an IROC. There is a difference. You suck, ok? you are an idiot.
If you guys are thinking that '87-'92 5.0's were 225 BHP, and in '93 they lowered it to 205 BHP, you're wrong. the truth is, after they first tested the power of the engine in '87, they didn't realy properly test it again until '93. and after '87 the engine underwent a series of detuning changes over its years. starting with the MAF sensor in '89, which helped aftermarket performance, but did loose some stock numbers. when tested properly in '93, they realized a few changes took away some power.
Idiot
fuckyourmother1960 2 months ago
one of the best looking ever made
weld3z 9 months ago
It was the pistons in the 93's that decreased the horsepower!
71dime 9 months ago
@5literimporteater
you are right. i make fun of my dad because he has a 1993 GT just like this one. granted it's not stock anymore. but its a little family feud between whos mustang is better. my 2004 GT or his 1993 GT. lol
SVTCobraR315 1 year ago
my fathers 93 still looks just like that to this day... but no IROCs on the block
SVTCobraR315 1 year ago
@charger1970and68 look at the year of the recording dip shit. How many times do you see a foxbody and a third gen camaro on the same street these days in that kind of condition?? Oh, and that was an RS, not an IROC. There is a difference. You suck, ok? you are an idiot.
outcastMETALchild89 1 year ago
@outcastMETALchild89 iroc camaros suck ok. they look like shit and are slow as a mother fucker and how is this "rare footage" ? you are an idiot.
charger1970and68 1 year ago
Ronping on it in the neighborhood? Shame Shame. But it is so hard to resist isn't it. Just kidding. Thanks for posting!
Bill0254 1 year ago
If you guys are thinking that '87-'92 5.0's were 225 BHP, and in '93 they lowered it to 205 BHP, you're wrong. the truth is, after they first tested the power of the engine in '87, they didn't realy properly test it again until '93. and after '87 the engine underwent a series of detuning changes over its years. starting with the MAF sensor in '89, which helped aftermarket performance, but did loose some stock numbers. when tested properly in '93, they realized a few changes took away some power.
5literimporteater 1 year ago
@RaveSnoreThrong dont forget the drop in torque from the previous gt's up to the 93 cobra it went from 300 ft. lbs to 285ft lbs
brace06 1 year ago