Atari Jaguar Graphics Showcase
Top Comments
All Comments (70)
-
Pitty of DOOM , It could be a WAY better on this console
-
@djmick90 and then the ps1 came out next year. case closed.
-
@xboxmodder02 N64 CPU has 93.75 MHz.
N64 emulators and PS1 emulators only were possible because of powerful graphics hardware acceleration on PC.
Jaguar emulation runs only on CPU due to the unusual 3D graphics hardware of the Jaguar.
That's why it took much longer for Jaguar emulation to become reality, because PCs had to have a much more powerful CPUs.
-
@xboxmodder02 Please go to wikipedia and read again.
The jaguar has 5 processors, not just 2. And 2 of those processors are 64 bit.
Also the bus is 64 bit.
And the Motorola 68000 is not 16 bit, it's a mixture of some 16 bit parts and some 32 bit parts.
I've never heard of an Jaguar development kit for Amiga, but there's one for Atari Falcon and one for IBM PC.
And jaguar games don't run on development kits.
-
@SomeFluffer64 if that was the case then why could i run n64 games on a 32-bit windows 98 pc perfectly back then in 1998.if it had a true 64-bit processor then that wouldnt be possible.if you dont believe me google ultrahle emulator.
-
@xboxmodder02 the n64 had a 64-bit processor and 32 bit graphical capabilities.
-
@MrCumstein Maybe lol but saying its fits between snes and ps1 would be extremely generous, if it sticked to 2d it's games would have looked better than literally 99 % of its game focusing on pseudo 3d lol
-
The Jag was actually quite a powerful 2D machine. Much like the Saturn in the sense that it's true strength was sprites, not polygons.
-
@freak51 lol I'd say that's a bit harsh.
-
Cannon Fodder FTW!!!
don't know what everyones bitching about the jag actually has some decent looking games.
djmick90 2 years ago 22
Excuse me, why would CHECKERED FLAG be in here??? That game is the biggest embarassment to the Jag library.
dogeymon83 2 years ago 13