Reverse Speech of the News July 2007

Miscellaneous reverse speech examples from Newt Gingrich, George Bush, Angelina Jolie and the Glasgow bombing

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• reverse
• speech
• david
• oates
• george
• bush
• newt
• gingrich

[jfreedan]

Agreed. If you dont read the words then the reverse speech is heard as nothing but inaudible noise but if you read the text then your brain kind of encourages you to match the sounds to the words.

[CorLeonis01]

More properly, 'We lead the show', sounds like, 'We're leadin' this show'. However, captions should not be provided in reverse speech examples, if it compelling enough, it should stand on it's own.

[newchannelish]

Many of these can be interpreted into many other sayings. "Dope the senate" can also be "note the senate", e.g.  The words can also be applied to tons of things. highly entertaining and an original form of analysis, though.

[stemart1641]

I love this. What everyone needs to understand is that this discovery by David Oates solves, or can solve, many of the worlds problems, especially personal problems. It allows the one who is open enough to have insight into whether or not another is being honest. Keep up the good work David...you are a true leader!!

[JulieColleen]

On Reverse Speech does this mean if I say the same thing that it will come out like that. I don't understand.

[NoorAlHaqiqa]

That is NOT the original Paul McCartney. The voice does NOT match the voice of the real Paul from the beginning of the band. Not at all. And the accent is entirely different than a Liverpool accent. I bet if the facial features of that one and the original were compared there would be great differences, just as with Saddam and his many doubles.

[wkdjamesmat]

I covered my eyes for a few of them and I couldn't make out what it was saying, when I saw the words then it seemed the make sense. I can't help feeling that even if the text was "Happy meal with a coke" then our brain would make the connection.

[lurkingshaddow666]

fake and gay?

[johnleejohnson]

@TexasToast09 Agreed, these people are no better that professional debunkers. They deny without thinking for themselves, they ignore any evidence that doesn't fit with their established world view which is handed to them by authorities who are appointed over them.

As you say they are deaf, not physically per say, but mentally deaf. Even listening to this with headphones in a quiet room wouldn't help them

They are hopelessly close minded, and I have no pity for them.

[johnleejohnson]

@brownm279 Did you ever consider that while the synthesized voice technology doesn't have a subconscious, that the person who wrote the book you used does in fact have a subconscious mind like every other person who communicates, writes and speaks? Maybe we just believe what we want to believe in accord with our the world view established by our gatekeepers in society?

[girlznguitarz]

What is the point????? Of this?????

[xander7ful]

I don't think this is nonsense, in the mind of the hearer, at all. When they're telling the truth, it comes out in reverse. When they're thinking something they aren't saying, it comes out. When they're lying, it comes out in reverse. I don't see how you can miss it.