Hunchbacked debunks Gonetoplaid about Apollo 11

Gonetoplaid has recently "debunked" some of my incoherence about Apollo 11.
This videos aims to debunk his debunking.
Now and then Gonetoplaid is able to find a misintepretation I made (I'm not perfect, when I started investigating in the Apollo journal, I was making

some misinterpretations; progressively I have learnt to avoid them; but I can still make some).
But in this video, I consider he has found none.
I explain more in detail the incoherences, and why Gonetoplaid's debunking is incorrect and misses the point.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• moon
• hoax
• faked
• pictures
• BadAstronomy
• debunk
• NASA
• Apollo
• 11
• conspiracy
• incoherences
• perspective
• geometry
• logic

[glennheston]

@hunchbacked You have the balls to think you are as intelligent as Hawking and Cox! Go get a good telescope and see the landing sites for yourself. And stop thinking you're intelligent!

[nameofthepen]

Faust knows "scientists" and "astronauts" can always be bought.

[hunchbacked]

@Raliams

I am even going to be brutal; I don't deny that Hawking and Cox may have intelligence, but, when it is about Apollo, I am afraid their intelligence is going down to the toilet, and I really think it!

[hunchbacked]

@Raliams

Sometimes, when someone is fascinated by an even; even if he has some intelligence, he may be unable to use his intelligence to see that what he believes in makes in fact no sense, and contains aberrations.

I am afraid it is the case of Hawking and Cox.

It is with reason that I believe in the moon hoax, and I am not impressed that these men believe in Apollo; too bad for them.

[hunchbacked]

@Raliams

Then I guess they have not much studied the Apollo project.

I have studied it much in depth and seen many incoherencies in it.

I am a space engineer, and when I say that the computer of Apollo is incoherent and the electronic interfaces are full of (intentional) errors, I really mean it!

I would suggest them to read the documentation of Apollo in detail, for I am sure they have not done it.

[Raliams]

@hunchbacked Either you are being disingenuous or just plain ignorant. Stephen Hawking has held the position of professor of mathematics at Cambridge and is a world renowend theoretical physicist and cosmologist, Professor Brian Cox is a particle physicist and a leading researcher at CERN. Both are real scientists. I suspect they know a great deal about space travel, but who are they when compared with the giant intellects of the moon hoax believers. This nonsense is a waste of time. Adieu

[hunchbacked]

@Raliams

Stephen Hawking and Brian Cox are just writers, talented may be, but not real scientists; they are not specialists of space travel.

[Raliams]

@hunchbacked Really? Which ones? Stephen Hawking? Brian Cox? The Scientists at CERN? I know a small number of scientists with PhDs who believe that the earth is 6000 years old and that man walked with dinosaurs, but they are wrong. So what some scientists believe proves nothing.

[Raliams]

@hunchbacked , Expert of your ass??? I'm not what you think, besides we haven't even been formally introduced. Its not about being arrogant it's just that none of the evidence moon hoax believers present stands up to scrutiny. If it did then your case would be more credible.

[hunchbacked]

@Raliams

I have not outwitted some of the worlds greatest scientists, because those who ardently defend Apollo are not the world's greatest scientists but just amateurs.

Many real scientists have doubts about Apollo, that's the reality, but you prefer to ignore it.