911 September clues amateur shot part 2

IMPORTANT UPDATE : I copied this video to serve as a backup in case youtube sucks...thanks...
"THE PLANE FACTS " : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkZKOq...


911 AMATEUR pt2 :
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice.

The Naudet footage is maybe the most diffused of all the 9/11 images so there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak....as it is forged.

My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ). I wasn't able to perform this analysis earlier as the 4 versions I had of this famous footage were not as good resolution as this 5th version I recently found.

The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a crass graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :

MAIN EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :

We may observe that the visible right side ( not covered by 1st explosion dust) of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, as much as 30% of the wall is still intact - AFTER the 1st impact. At the 6sec mark we see shape charges igniting and eventually ripping open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember.

As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the 911 hoax planners : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the 160ft gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1.

NOTE TO SKEPTICS : No, that black gash appearing suddenly is NOT smoke - it appears too quickly and develops in opposite wind direction.

The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET (a missile's most likely - as at the Pentagon...) crashed into the WTC1 or - for that matter - WTC2 (see SEPTEMBER CLUES).

In my honest opinion, the plane / no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.

911 AMATEUR part1 :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paOkzNSarmU

911 AMATEUR part3 :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC03YC-TjaY


To download my main 9/11 research "SEPTEMBER CLUES" in high resolution, please visit :
http://www.thesocialservice.it

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• September
• clues
• amateur
• shot
• part
• conspiracy
• myth
• hoax
• fraud
• cover
• up
• exposed
• bush
• illuminati
• nwo
• NWO
• chemtrails
• WTC
• doctored
• william
• cooper
• engineer
• boeing
• 727
• flight
• airplane
• media
• manipulation
• controlled
• demolition
• bombs
• planted
• inside
• building
• job
• news
• tv
• anchors
• producer
• video
• research
• analysis

[saultrain]

If you buy this--you're brain has failed. This should worry you since your brain is also your mind.

[JPDisme]

Do truther's breed? 

I'm very afraid of you all.

[sweetrobert580]

dont matter what u try work out if sumthing is gettin coverd up we will never find out what really happend

[toddholladay]

at 3.33 do u see all the grey or white smoke almost like camara flashes below the strike area

[shortstacknaat]

everyone that was watching saw the planes crash into the trade center

[TRUDOWNSOUTH]

This is quite intersting though........hhhmmmm.......

[yoyorast]

Poor little boy.. open your eyes, you'll see the plane.