Occupy Wall Street is a JOKE...

How can anyone take them seriously, when they don't even know why they are protesting????

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• occupy
• wall
• street
• capitalism
• new
• york
• NYPD
• mayor
• bloomberg
• bailouts
• tea
• party
• protests
• what's
• next
• drudge
• report
• Adam
• Carolla
• President
• Ron
• Paul

[Sanguiluna]

When this vid first got posted, there were almost twice as many dislikes than likes. Now that the honeymoon is over and the hype is gone people are finally seeing this "movement" for what it really is.

[cajoby]

Occupy Wall Street is the dumbest thing I ever heard. They have one in our city (Occupy Rochester). These people have no jobs no money, they sleep in tents which the city has provided (by taxing us), and shitting in garbage cans. Two months of waiting and nothing has happened, great accomplishment. :/

[okiedouk]

The occupiers were planted around cities to make people think something is getting done and smugly spread misinformation and to decrease the peoples faith in themselves by showing these "people" as ignorant and standing for nothing they understand everything we get that is said to help further us is just a band-aid at the best you could hope for. Every time people are getting riled up they do something like that and it is getting progressively larger and people buy ALWAYS buy into it.

[MrJarth]

@AToxicOrange there is nothing bad with socialism. if you look at the big picture there aren't enough jobs for people to fill anymore, technology removes jobs because a machine can do the work. the natural progression of the human race is for no one to work.

anyway america is so far right it doesn't even know what communism means anymore, socialism isn't bad. socialism help santoriums farm though subsides and the oil companies get some too.

[AToxicOrange]

@Omnicronimous Exactly what is wrong with socialism, though? What is so awfully terrible about it?

[AToxicOrange]

@Omnicronimous I'm not refuting. If this were a debate, you would be offering the argument to my position, to which I offer a counterargument. As you haven't supported your argument, I offer nothing.

[AToxicOrange]

@Omnicronimous That's not how it works. You, as the argumentative party, must clarify what you mean in order to support your argument against him. I said I have no problem with him, you argued against

[Omnicronimous]

@AToxicOrange I find it funny that you openly state that you support Soros, you support the *Open Society agenda, and you openly support socialism, but you actually try to imply that Soros isn't promoting socialism because he "helped" Hungary become "capitalist".

Just drop the garbage.

[Omnicronimous]

@AToxicOrange No - You elaborate. You say George Soros is a swell guy. You say you support *his vision of an Open Society. You tell me - What does he stand for point by point. *I know what he stands for. I know the issues well. However, do you even know what you're trying to refute? It should be easy enough for you. You say you support the guy. So, what are the major issues on which he makes a stand? Do you know?

[AToxicOrange]

@Omnicronimous I do find it funny that despite Soros' involvement in the introduction of capitalism in Hungary, you insist he has socialist plans.

[AToxicOrange]

@Omnicronimous and when I say "not that bad", I of course mean it's not that bad unless you're a right-wing nationalist.