Many creationist arguments would be familiar to Darwin. But others--such as Young Earth Creationism--would have baffled him. Genie Scott explores the then and now of creationism, at the University of Chicago's 2009 Darwin Celebration. Event date: 10/30/2009.
He would say,"Noooooo... please don't burn me!!!!!!!". And don't sodomize me either :-/
Douglas1102 2 months ago
@Mogley52 Moron
winterstellar 2 months ago
@Mogley52 You sir, are a fucking idiot.
Rockster969 3 months ago
@Mogley52 I bet your article sucks. You spread misinformation.
lesouder2222 4 months ago
@Mogley52 people such as yourself do not have the intelligence to be worthy of life. I would slaughter you.
MouthOfTheUnknown 4 months ago
@Mogley52 Fuck you
Drgamedood 5 months ago
@Mogley52 There are 250,000 plus published(in main stream scientific journals), peer reviewed(in main stream scientific journals) scientific papers on evolution, in the past 150 years. Yet you say you can disprove the theorum. Please post the published (main stream scientific journal), peer reviewed (main stream scientific journal) paper that does.
wizard970 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Darwin would have apologized for his scientific ignorance! Fossils that have been used to support human evolution, for example, have ultimately been found to be either hoaxes, non-human, or human, but not human and non-human. Read my Internet article published in Pravda, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
happy birthday mr darwin,,,, 202 today.
userwl2850 1 year ago
@salaf83
That is from
[Charles Darwin (ed. J. W. Burrow), The Origin of Species (Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1974.), p. 205.]
where it does not terminate with a period to note the end of a sentence, but with a semicolon, before continuing:
"; but, to the best of my judgment, the greater number are only apparent, and those that are real are not, I think, fatal to my theory."
You have dropped a quote mine in MID-SENTENCE, and thus fail forever.
rkyeun 1 year ago