Reply to Coughlan666 on the burqa

CORRECTION: I said that burqas were only worn in Afghanistan. That's not 100% true. There were some parts of Pakistan, on the Afghan border, that did adopt the burqa. It was never voluntary, however, and everything else I said there was accurate.

The reply to BoundlessEyes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJvTEeOjZdE

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/benfromcanada

Category:

Education

Tags:

• coughlan666
• patcondell
• burqa
• burka
• ban
• beny0hama
• benyohama
• logic
• fallacy
• islam
• muslim
• culture
• feminism
• women's
• rights

[1GodOnlyOne]

You probably think that they do, but no, those sunglasses do not make you look cool.

Actually, they make you look like a dunce.

Subscription request denied!

[BENY0HAMA]

@1GodOnlyOne Subscription "request"? What the hell?

[DontBendOverForAllah]

Yep,

I made the same mistake so it is in fact

Hijab = headscarf

Niqab = headscarf + facescarf, eyes are still showing

Burqa = headscarf + complete covering of the face with a facenet, eyes cannot be seen

Is that right?

[BENY0HAMA]

Hijab is a verb for covering. There are plenty of different headscarves.

I was mistaken. The niqab is just the facescarf/veil, but it's almost always used with a headscarf

[alexvegas]

@Universefreedom If you didn't watch Coughlan's video about Condell, then how can you possibly know you disagree with him? How can you judge someone based only on the fact that they disagree with someone who says stuff you like to believe? You might be interested to see WHY he disagrees with him and on what issues.

[DontBendOverForAllah]

@Universefreedom

You are right! coughlan666 started off as a standup comedian channel (he is trying to make a living from his Youtube channel) - he failed. He then realised that the atheist community was huge and joined in with that. He thinks he should be the most subscribed atheist on Youtube, but since he is to scared to criticise Islam that is never going to happen, so he has been running 'smear' campaigns on both Pat and thunderf00t to try and reduce their subscriber base.

[Universefreedom]

@DontBendOverForAllah about Coughlan666, I watched one of his videos and wondered why would anyone pay attention to someone like him.

I recently saw that he posted a video called" Pat is an ignorant hypocrite idiot" or something like that, ( I did not watch it )he does not realize that he is the idiot .

He will NEVER be like Pat, I think he envies him and posts idiotic videos to stir up controversy in an attempt to get attention and subscribers, BUT he miserably fails!

[Doluses]

So, if I'm to understand you correctly laws that you are arguing for is ban the of the Burqa in situations when the identity of the women is important like voting, banking ect...

But that is not what's being discussed here Europe, it's a complete ban, everywhere expect in your home. The laws you have in Canada is all ready in effect here, a bank will deny you service if they can't identify you and so on.

I think Mr 666 is OK with that.

[baliG83]

@jonwvin ur wrong- its 786.

get educated.

[adamalden]

You take the dick or you take the piss in your butt...

[jonwvin]

666 turn that upside down and you get 999 the sign of the devil or allah

[Shikami42]

Even better i will do what i can to allow that freedom to others.

The history of the Burkha is totally irrelevant to that.

and you proved the best argument against bans..when IDENTIFICATION is required that obviously can be accomplished without bans.

Now im gonna put on my ass free chaps and go for a walk in the park..sweet freedom