Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

ANTIGRAVITY Explained By EX- ILLUMINATI! 2/8

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,092
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 27, 2009

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Gorbatsjov666 I appreciate your comment, but I am not ready to be that cynical. Besides, we can see man-made objects left on the moon as well as interact with them such as a laser reflector that measures precise distance between the moon and the earth. Also we have satellites orbiting the earth without which modern life would grind to a halt.

  • @classictutor Maybe we never did send any space crafts out.. It could just as well have been made in a movie studio..

  • Didn't Michelson-Morley experiment disprove the existence of ether? But if you say this ether does not interact with light but it interacts with or even causes gravity, you are asking me to take your word at face value. You say that spinning mass generates gravity waves and it interacts with reflected wave coming from ether creating push and pull zones. If that were the case, how did we send astronauts to the moon or space crafts to other planets? It'd require different gravity calculations.

  • I've been tricked!

  • Yes - I strongly suspect some of his assertions are untrue and he is what you may call a disinformation agent. Has anybody read William. R. Lyne's Pentagon Aliens (1st published 1993)? That would make a good cross reference for this particular upload series. Really would appreciate feedback as my particular focus is to try to sort the wheat from the chaff (preaching to the converted). Tesla technology seems to be a worthwhile pursuit. Cheers

  • he's kinda correct....but the "drop in a pond theory " falls apart when we consider planets typically have an oval rotation around the sun.

  • I highly doubt that someone this educated would waste time to lie about this.

  • he's lying. but there could be grains of truth to it

  • @OldmanMaestro: And mine

  • @aramic1989 He's your Father.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more