Election 2011: Stephen Harper's debate glare

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,723
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 13, 2011

Twitter is abuzz over Stephen Harper's 'glare' from the English leaders debate...kind of reminds you of a particular scene in Kill Bill. His stare makes it look like something very bad is about to go down.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • poor jack....it should have been HARPER...

  • This needs to be re-done with lasers shooting from his eyes!

    

see all

All Comments (115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @darkoanton5 oh ok.

  • Webster's dictionary definition of a drug. The noun.

    according to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (1) : a substance recognized in an official pharmacopoeia or formulary (2) : a substance intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease (3) : a substance other than food intended to affect the structure or function of the body (4) : a substance intended for use as a component of a medicine but not a device or a component, part, or accessory of a device

  • Oxford dictionary definition of a drug. The noun.

    1. a medicine or other substance which has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body.

    2. a substance taken for its narcotic or stimulant effects, often illegally.

  • @darkoanton5 depends which crimes... murders,assult and rape yes. People who like smoke marijuana in their homes to relax no. Me and Harper have very different views on Crime. He says that he has lived a completey drug-free life and yet there's videos of him drinking alcohol (since when did alcohol stop being a drug?).. Why is a man who knows nothing about marijuana making laws about it (he hasn't even tried it). Furthermore, legalizing it would end the recent BC drug wars.

  • @GeniusSelfproclaimed Yet you are against being tough on crime.

  • @darkoanton5 gun registry doesn't take away guns from everyone it just makes it so the government can prevent people who shouldn't have them from getting one and it allows them to keep tabs on those that do own them. I'f I was PM I would actually make the registry/ gun laws stronger so that parents can't own guns to prevent child related accidents from happening. As for Hitler and Mussolini, citizens of England aren't allowed to have guns and nothings happened there.

  • @GeniusSelfproclaimed Hitler and Mussolini took away the guns of the private citizens and we all know what happened after they did that.

  • @GeniusSelfproclaimed Look is a fantasy to think that we we don't have a two tiered systemas it is. Is everybody's medicine covered under an insurance plan. NO! Does the government (here in Ontario) cover eye examinations. NO! Is chiroprctic or phyiotherapy covered under health insurance. NO!. Is dentistry. NO! So, please define what you mean by universal healthcare.

  • @viper10011 donavon called you a dumbass, not me. Sorry I think my other comment should have been direct to the self proclaimed genius and not you.

  • @darkoanton5 I know there a bunch of hypacrits thats why im conservative why are you calling me a dumbass?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more