Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Gravity Engine 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,170
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 18, 2007

This describes the possibility of a gravitational engine

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • actually special relativity has a lot to do with gravity. so perhaps it is you who is talking out your ass......or just trying to troll

  • OMG will you just stop talking out of your ass please? Photons are not electrons, amplitude/frequency modulation has nothing to do with this, and that's not even in the picture. The circle you drew is part of Bohr's model, nothing to do with electron orbitals. Electrons don't move at the speed of light. c is a velocity, not energy, the one you wrote is in meters/second - nothing to do with planck's constant. Special relativity doesn't say anything about gravity. I've already run out of space

  • woah....what? why does the energy not follow the mass in the southern hemisphere? I guess I missed something.....if its obvious, or already stated earlier in the video, then forgive me,as I have not had any sleep yet, and its like 6 AM here...so my brain aint werkin too good-like 'n stuff.& I'z findin' things er confusin' me mur n' mur as my sleeplessness goes into daytime, n suns comin' up, n I'z make'N big bolognese breakfast burritto...mmm sleepytime breakfast burritto....huh? too sleepy zzz

  • Oh yawn! Pseudo science all the way.

  • @StCorridon2

    Following on from stikowsky's excellent advice, you should also read some good textbooks on quantum and sub-atomic physics, too.

    What you have here is a jumble of disconnected concepts and equations, bound together into a nonsensical framework. I could go through and address your errors point by point, but life is just too short.

  • sir with all respect, your treatise sounds more like alchemy than physics. please please read a good textbook on relativity...Time is not constant flowing: E=mc^2 can be derived from the lorentz-transformations ie under the assumption that the flow of time is *not* contstant....

  • The concept is one of a basic force used to propel a mass in outer space. The technicalities are no more complicated than posted. Needs to be tested to demonstrate c^2=e/m and is a force able to be increased and decreased.

  • I kind of recognize the physics behind the scheme of a gravity engine, but how exactly are you going to tamper with the um. Machines technicalities?

  • Unfortunely, the video does not show haw wnery could be extracted,

  • Mass induction of molecules. Problem is making a container to hold the field. With out tearing Molecule structure down of the container. They figured out that if you supper cool the molecules it keeps them from being too excited. The harmonic tone of the Field resonates at a high frequency. Reducing the high amount of friction of the gravity field produces. This is all possable and being done as we speak

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more