Uploaded by 5imone5 on Aug 1, 2008
Frank Stella (born May 12, 1936) is an American painter and printmaker. He is a significant figure in minimalism and post-painterly abstraction. He was born in Malden, Massachusetts. After attending high school at Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts, he went on to Princeton University, where he painted, influenced by the abstract expressionism of Jackson Pollock and Franz Kline, and majored in history. Stella moved to New York in 1958 after his graduation. He is one the most well-regarded postwar American painters who still works today. Frank Stella has reinvented himself in consecutive bodies of work over the course of his five-decade career. pon moving to New York City, he reacted against the expressive use of paint by most painters of the abstract expressionist movement, instead finding himself drawn towards the "flatter" surfaces of Barnett Newman's work and the "target" paintings of Jasper Johns. He began to produce works which emphasized the picture-as-object, rather than the picture as a representation of something, be it something in the physical world, or something in the artist's emotional world. Stella married Barbara Rose, later a well-known art critic, in 1961. This was a departure from the technique of creating a painting by first making a sketch. This new aesthetic found expression in a series of paintings, the Black Paintings (60) in which regular bands of black paint were separated by very thin pinstripes of unpainted canvas. Die Fahne Hoch! (1959) is one such painting. It takes its name ("The flag on high" in English) from the first line of the Horst-Wessel-Lied, the anthem of the National Socialist German Workers Party, and Stella pointed out that it is in the same proportions as banners used by that organization. In any case, its emotional coolness belies the contentiousness its title might suggest, reflecting this new direction in Stella's work. Stella's art was recognized for its innovations before he was twenty-five. In 1959, several of his paintings were included in "Three Young Americans" at the Allen Memorial Art Museum at Oberlin College, as well as in "Sixteen Americans" at the Museum of Modern Art in New York (60). Stella joined dealer Leo Castelli's stable of artists in 1959. From 1960 he began to produce paintings in aluminum and copper paint which, in their presentation of regular lines of color separated by pinstripes, are similar to his black paintings. However they use a wider range of colors, and are his first works using shaped canvases (canvases in a shape other than the traditional rectangle or square), often being in L, N, U or T-shapes. These later developed into more elaborate designs, in the Irregular Polygon series (67), for example. Also in the 1960s, Stella began to use a wider range of colors, typically arranged in straight or curved lines. Later he began his Protractor Series (71) of paintings, in which arcs, sometimes overlapping, within square borders are arranged side-by-side to produce full and half circles painted in rings of concentric color. These paintings are named after circular cities he had visited while in the Middle East earlier in the 1960s. The Irregular Polygon canvases and Protractor series further extended the concept of the shaped canvas. Stella began his extended engagement with printmaking in the mid-1960s, working first with master printer Kenneth Tyler at Gemini G.E.L. Stella produced a series of prints during the late 1960s starting with a print called Quathlamba I in 1968. Stella's abstract prints in lithography, screenprinting, etching and offset lithography (a technique he introduced) had a strong impact upon printmaking as an art.n 1967, Stella designed the set and costumes for Scramble, a dance piece by Merce Cunningham. The Museum of Modern Art in New York presented a retrospective of Stella's work in 1970, making him the youngest artist to receive one.
During the following decade, Stella introduced relief into his art, which he came to call "maximalist" painting for its sculptural qualities. Ironically, the paintings that had brought him fame before 1960 had eliminated all such depth. After introducing wood and other materials in the Polish Village series (73), created in high relief, he began to use aluminum as the primary support for his paintings. As the 1970s and 1980s progressed, these became more elaborate and exuberant. Indeed, his earlier Minimalism [more] became baroque, marked by curving forms, Day-Glo colors, and scrawled brushstrokes. Similarly, his prints of these decades combined various printmaking and drawing techniques. In 1973, he had a print studio installed in his New York house.
-
178 likes, 4 dislikes
5:07BRICE MARDEN on Asian artby FLYPMedia6,991 views
Featured Video
1:03Frank Stella on shaping the canvasby sfmoma7,002 views
3:24AB EX NY: Ad Reinhardtby MoMAvideos4,884 views
1:49Pablo Picasso: interviewby pietro68bleu105,910 views
3:06Golub: The Canvas takes Shapeby Kartemquin36,152 views
1:50Willem de Kooning Iby chromatichouse24,298 views
4:02Interview with Andy Warhol and Jean Michel Basq...by guyhepner130,246 views
7:01Painters Paintingby ohmygangrene17,384 views
7:04Rothkoby CirrostratusMusic81,131 views
9:30Richard Serra - Film & Video 1/3by kunstspektrum2,960 views
10:06The Making of "Painters Painting: The New York ...by thefilmarchive27,270 views
9:30Mies van der Rohe's Farnsworth House (1 of 3)by hotmonger21,142 views
9:31Sol LeWitt: A Wall Drawing Retrospectiveby MASSM0CA28,767 views
0:44Edie Sedgwick - Interviewby TheVitaminBee177,017 views
6:37Cy Twombly Exhibiton at MUMOK Viennaby mumokvienna21,950 views
4:09Barnett Newman Interviewby chromatichouse8,918 views
1:07:27Masters Series: An Evening with Frank Stellaby ToledoMuseum2,463 views
1:18Picasso paints a womanby New4day10,209 views
10:04Frank Stella at the METROPOLITAN MUSEUMby jameskalm14,033 views
0:08What do you think of Jasper Johns?by nswd270,680 views
- Loading more suggestions...
@minarima wow..no shit Sherlock, and secondly, full marks for missing the entire thread of the humour. Perhaps a touch dry and obscure for you.
misternylon 3 weeks ago
@misternylon you don't need to use cryogenics, he's still alive.
minarima 3 weeks ago
if one day ill make money, ill buy stella
fuckingharpsichord 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Man. I didn't know how clearly Stella speaks about his work. Easily the most well spoken painter I can think of. This was very, very interesting. And his opinion of the secondary abstract expressionists. Very astute.
shoesshoes 2 months ago
KEEP THE VIEWER FROM READING THE PAIN-TING!
DavidEdwardSchnell 2 months ago
before i thought just like those art critics b/c i couldnt really analyze his paintings.. or understand for that matter. this interview helped a lot and doing further research about him and the way he approached his art is very brilliant in my opinion.
gdragon9410 3 months ago
Looking for representation :)
zamiracanoaliaga. com
ArtistZamira 3 months ago
@misternylon easily my favorite of the clique of that era...im not a non-representational artist bu there is a quality about our work that i find strangely similar, and strangely similarly interesting. here i see the part of sneaker decal, here a polyesther bedsheet from the 70s... BUT i like his hard lines and I like his use of a white field, and he bests rothko (who used blurry lines). I like his monologue a lot, it has a lot of universal appeal even out of context.
ippolytos1 3 months ago
@ippolytos1 I ended up downloading the whole film on Vuze, it's such a joy to sit and watch actual great artists from that period really talk with passion about their work.
I think Frank Stella comes across as genuinely authoritive in this doco, he is engaged and confident in his delivery, and yes he has great glasses.
misternylon 3 months ago
@misternylon well he had fucking great glasses. Those frames are so much better looking than what people have today. They're even better than woody allen's. There's such a subtlety about them. The high moderns really had a lot, certainly not everything, and so many people hated them (because they were stupid people.) who had stupid superficial ideas. But dont you think everyone wore glasses then because they "thought you looked smart?" or was optometry just so established that glasses were life.
ippolytos1 3 months ago