@WHENYOUREALISE Sorry, you're very wrong on this. The idea that Deckard might be a replicant, as suggested by the unicorn dream and the origami unicorn that Gaff leaves, it a terribly predictable and pointless 'twist' in the story that destroys the poignancy of Roy's death scene (where he saves a pathetic human because he views all life as beautiful rather than just because Deckard is another replicant). Deckard's love for Rachel is more meaningful if he transcends the human/replicant thing.
Suprmida en la primera versión, aparece en la versión del director. Sugiere que Ford es también un replicante, relacionandolo con la figura de papel que hace al final J.E. Olmos. Creo que es mejor que no lo sea, a mi parecer. También es mejor la voz en off de la primera versión, que no aparece en la segunda.
@Scytheriah hmmm - so how does gaffe know about the unicorn? Roy doesnt know that deckard is a replicant!
PHONEYPOLITICS 1 month ago
@WHENYOUREALISE Sorry, you're very wrong on this. The idea that Deckard might be a replicant, as suggested by the unicorn dream and the origami unicorn that Gaff leaves, it a terribly predictable and pointless 'twist' in the story that destroys the poignancy of Roy's death scene (where he saves a pathetic human because he views all life as beautiful rather than just because Deckard is another replicant). Deckard's love for Rachel is more meaningful if he transcends the human/replicant thing.
Scytheriah 3 months ago
@WHENYOUREALISE Both the Directors Cut and Final Cut Include the unicorn
7heHarry 7 months ago
should be in the film - criminal that its not, one of the biggest points - is deckard a replicant?
WHENYOUREALISE 7 months ago
Suprmida en la primera versión, aparece en la versión del director. Sugiere que Ford es también un replicante, relacionandolo con la figura de papel que hace al final J.E. Olmos. Creo que es mejor que no lo sea, a mi parecer. También es mejor la voz en off de la primera versión, que no aparece en la segunda.
comisariostrelnikov 3 years ago