Uploaded by mamtashastradhody on Apr 24, 2009
O R D E R
13.10.2006
Crl. M. No.11363/2006
Issue notice, returnable on 20th November, 2006. R.S. SODHI, J. P.K.BHASIN, J.
OCTOBER 13, 2006
'AA'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 193/2006 STATE ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Gopal Subramaniam, ASG with
Ms.Mukta Gupta, Standing Counsel and Mr.
Ashwini Vaish, Advocate.
versus SIDHARTHA VASHISHT and ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Ram Jethmalani, Sr.Advocate
with Pt.R.K.Naseem and Mr.Manu Sharma,
Mr.Harish Ghai, Mr.P.R.Mala, Ms.Lata
Krishnamurthy, Mr.Sachin Dev Sharma and
Mr.Sanjeev Manan Advocates for
respondents 1,5,6 and 8.
Mr.S.K.Sharma, K.N.Balagopal and
Mr.A.P.Mukandan and Mr.G.K.Bharti,
Advocates for respondent No.2.
From the reading of the application and the arguments addressed by learned counsel for the parties, we find that the respondent/applicant is greatly concerned about the criticism that this court may be open to at the end of the proceedings. He is anxious to insulate the Court from that onslaught.
While appreciating the concern of the respondent/applicant, we may point out that in our criminal justice system, up to the stage of High Court, we adopt a procedure of open court hearing. All orders of this court are made in public gaze open to expert criticism and public debate as also to the review by a final forum.
The news item over which the respondent/applicant feels perturbed is a stale representation and cannot be said to have taken any of the parties by surprise. Insulating ourselves from constructive criticisms would result in grave injustice.
The matter has proceeded to a great length without any reservations and cannot be allowed to be derailed on that account. In this view of the matter the concern of the respondent need not detain us any further.
However, we may also point out that the Supreme Court in M.P.Lohia Vs. State of West Bengal and Anr. JT 2005(2) SC 105 has taken great exception to the reports appearing in the Press that may tend to prejudice the atmosphere against the accused. The relevant portion of the judgment is para 10 which reads as under:-
?10. Having gone through the records, we find one disturbing factor which we feel is necessary to comment upon in the interest of justice. The death of Chandni took place on 28th February, 2002 and the complaint in this regard was registered and the investigation was in progress.
The application for grant of anticipatory bail was disposed of by the High Court of Calcutta on 13.2.2004 and Special Leave Petition was pending before this Court. Even then an article has appeared in a magazine called 'Saga' titled ?Doomed by Dowry? written by one
Kakoli Poddar based on her interview of the family of the deceased. Giving version of the tragedy an extensively quoting the father of the deceased as to his version of the case. The facts narrated therein are all materials that may
be used in the forthcoming trial in this case and we have no hesitation that this type of articles appearing in the media would certainly interfere with the administration of justice. We deprecate this practice and caution the publisher,editor and journalist who were responsible for the said article against indulging in such trial by media when the issue is subjudiced.
However, to prevent any further issue being raised in this regard, we treat this matter as closed and hope that the other concerned in journalism would take note of this displeasure expressed by us for interfering with the administration of justice.?
Learned counsel Mr.Ram Jethmalani complains of a campaign let lose against his taking up this case, at the same time he does not want anyone to be sent to jail. We can, but lament, if there be such an attempt. Every counsel is duty bound to defend his client to the best of his ability irrespective of the acts complained of. Any interference with the conduct of the counsel of the case, by any quarters, would be viewed with great severity. It could also amount to contempt per se.
In view of what we have stated above, the application of the respondent is dismissed.
CRL.A. 193/2006
Adjourned at the request of Mr.Ram Jethmalani, who wants to reconsider his position.
List on 08th November, 2006.
-
1 likes, 0 dislikes
5:18
Chooriya * Azmaish * Sonu Nigamby Kiingkhan7867,671 views
8:17
Aazmaish - Part 1by wandp77824,691 views
4:27
CHUDIYAN BANTI HAI DUKANO MEINby vickey4503,389 views
5:13
AAZMAISHby pinksrvk1,897 views
4:38
Yaar Mat Ja Ke Meri Baat [ Aazmayish 1995 ] Rohit Kumar & Anjali Jathar * Sonu Nigam & Alka Yagnikby TheJeetkhan7,485 views
9:46
Nobody Does It Better: The Music of James Bond TV Doc part 1by alterdres36,038 views
6:24
Kabhi Kushi Gham Movie Song Bole Churiyan Bole Kangnaby GakyiDotCom303,005 views
4:09
Orlando Riva Sound Indian reservationby juliomoran9922,800 views
5:17
pt.2 Dowry deaths, a curse that lives on (In Hindi/Urdu)by xgotfiveonitx53,897 views
4:08
ORLANDO RIVA SOUND - INDIAN RESERVATION.wmvby DJDumatoMix5,064 views
7:16
✿ Yeh Neeli Peeli Chudiyan ✿by MissRedRose4Eva4,481 views
5:17
BEST OF KOLKATA BANGLA MOVIE SONG -TUMAY NA BOLA KOTHA.flvby k2m2z19,183 views
4:29
MULAQAT ABHI AZMAYISHby jawadahmad1434,290 views
6:33
KAUN HAI JO SAPNO MEIN AAYA_KAUN HAI JO SAPNO MEIN AAYAby 0779392140193,049 views
5:18
exbiiblog - anjali jathar cleavage in night dressby rabiyasm2,788 views
5:21
Karan mein nazaran (Choorian - 1998)by zoaibm178,941 views
4:24
O Sathi Ray!by p66701109,573 views
7:10
India Tonight: Burning Women - Part 3by CNBCTV183,092 views
6:27
MERE KHAYAL SE ``````````````` BALMAAby SaNaMTeRiKaSaM122,641 views
7:44
Dar Havaye To. Eftekhari. Yara Yara Gahiby afshin8718,981 views
- Loading more suggestions...
kiya song hja aur kiya pic ha samj nai a raha
0096898068815 11 months ago