Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Lecture - 23 Reasoning with Bayes Networks

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
12,749
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2008

Lecture Series on Artificial Intelligence by Prof. P. Dasgupta, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, IIT Kharagpur. For more Courses visit http://nptel.iitm.ac.in

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • eventually, as you parse the inference chain, the T/F values disappear and you come to rely only on the original P(b) and P(e).

  • excellent question! prof did not explain this in lec21. P(b), P(e) do NOT have parent (causal) variables. thus the probabilities are directly given as marginal probabilities (not conditional). However, in all the children (below the level of b, & e) we can and must take "conditional" probabilities. In these cond'l prob's, the b & e values only appear as T or F, bcs they are "given" as something that happened in earlier time! this is the essence of causality (time) in this particular belief net.

  • (i'm not prof dasgupta) he considered that probabilyty after consulting some statistics(that's my thought)and perhaps in india this is the probabilyty for earthquake or burglary

  • Hi Prof Dasgupta; I have a question : How do you obtain values for P(b), P(e), and why does this probably does not consider True/False states like as John and Mary according to "Belief Network Example" slide?

    Thanks in advanced !

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more