Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ken Miller

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,135
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 11, 2007

Intelligent Design Debate

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • What purpose does this theory serve and what need does it answer?

  • THEORIES in & of themselves are amoral. Theories precede proof. If a theory doesn't pan out over a reasonable period of time then it must be abandoned-- not worshiped, funded & defended at all costs.

see all

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @sgreen71778 Thats a good point you bring up. I think that test is something that most creationists don't bring to the table when it comes to evolution vs. ceationism. It does have an scientific explanation though. Evolution never predicts that test should come into play in evolution. This is a common mistake usually caused by the amount of test in scientific documents. Good try though.

  • @procommenter

    Did you read the next fucking paragraph?

  • @procommenter

    "Eagles & kangaroo rats inspire awe amongst god-deniers."

    I'm sorry, moron! What are you trying to say? Do you hate eagles because you have "god"?

  • test

  • @tomasino747 

    Mind if i do a j?

  • for some reason it just struck me that in this video Ken looks and sounds a lot like Jeff Bridges...

  • Shaving your head daily denies to you the protection

    that hair provides from trauma & sunburn.

  • 2 + 2 = 4 does not hold true in

    hyperspace at the speed of light.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more