Game Over: Kasparov vs the machine
Loading...
Loading...
299,447
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 4:41Kasparov vs 13 year old. Who is this kid?by ChessNoir153,482 views
- 4:23Playin chess with 56 Queens but losingby TheGabrielwest84,146 views
- 1:58Deep Blue vs. Kasparov 1997 game 6 chessby 4411417117,770 views
- 0:24Kasparov's funny reactionby halilosmanoglou224,212 views
- 9:31GM Kasparov vs FM Ghannoum, April 2011by SuperChessGeek96,967 views
- 0:50Supercomputer thinking Chess movesby wirefree10157,265 views
- 6:12Bobby Fischer Liveby AmadeusPicturesInt47,103 views
- 0:40George Costanza playing chessby ivariso403,074 views
- 4:58Kasparov , con 14 años ya era un genio !by ItzoSpain284,916 views
- 0:22kasparovs wrong moveby tipse171,024,480 views
- 5:21Magnus Carlsen 30 second chess matchby Sjakkhuset105,213 views
- 0:28Check mate in 2 moves (fastest possible)by ultranoob802170,316 views
- 6:47Interview with Magnus Carlsenby chessdomvideo57,095 views
- 10:37Judit Polgar Vs. Nigel Short - What a turnaround!!by ChessNoir45,828 views
- 0:23Kasparov comete un error contra Anandby davilaperu109,035 views
- 26:481972 World Chess Championship: Fischer vs. Spas...by ChessNetwork99,090 views
- 2:41Karpov vs Bareevby MrMaurice2A132,364 views
- 9:52Kasparov's Greatest Move 1/2by chessdocumentary42,572 views
- 10:27Kasparov versus Deep Thought documentary (part ...by twistedlot12,434 views
Well, since a computer can do a deep search and see the good material gain in the future (or the checkmate. Chess engines I've used before calculate material and choose the best in about 5 moves, but if it sees a mate in the next few moves, it will take it and favor it above all). I was interested though when they refused to provide the log of the game...
funnymadman4 1 month ago
Anyway, to the question why deep blue played differnt in the second game. Chess engines use heuristics (very key in ai). In these algorithms as a programmer you have the chance to modify some parameter so the search behaves different. As a programmer you have to test it to know which parameter shift a bit to greatens the effectivness! There is no need to postulate a human, if you know somethin about the theory of ai!
Markus112358 1 month ago
Whats your point? The human was and IS beaten by the computer algorithms. You CANT beat a computer with a deep search range, it's impossible for a human. Today we can build computers with a very great search deepness. I heard a number of about 40 on a todays supercomputer. Its just unbeatable, today and ever in the future. Chess programms are today very less interesting for research, because its just search, and search is much easier (mostly) than for example pattern matching.
Markus112358 1 month ago
Magnus Carlsen is #1 now...
OverLordGoldDragon 1 month ago
The only i don't understand is the accent of a critic in time 3:45?, i mean what was he really said?, did he said : Instead of winning 2 pawns, it plays a strategic move, which secures the win in a long term game?. So, can you tell me what he really said guys?.
BuZZxQSxCLAN 2 months ago
I understand the suspicion regarding IBM's refusal for a rematch, and in regards to the human characteristics of the game 2 moves. That being said Game 2 was not a draw, and being fed up by Game 6 does not mean he won.
dante862 2 months ago
cheated my ass... by this time 2011 even a kid would understand
sukanta201111 3 months ago in playlist Kasparov
@xxxIronLeexxx 1500 is good. it means you can beat 99 percent of people in the world since 99 percent of people suck at chess. lol
SCEPCOP 3 months ago
@27akram well jews have the highest IQ in the world. it's a proven fact. that's why they are in most positions of western power in all major industries.
SCEPCOP 3 months ago
why are pawns moving backwards at 00:25 ?
rishicomplex 3 months ago