This video addresses one of the more controversial assertions made by 9/11 researchers trying (in the absence of an honest official investigation) to determine what really happened. The videos prov...
This video addresses one of the more controversial assertions made by 9/11 researchers trying (in the absence of an honest official investigation) to determine what really happened. The videos provide a frame-by-frame analysis of the impacts of the planes into WTC 1 and WTC 2 showing a curious bright flash of light of unexplained origin. The importance of this flash is something that people of good intention can have different opinions on.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
It's Sad that I a High School "Drop Out" can get the gest of What the Experts EXPLAIN and how LOGIC it is.Well I guess some people just have their Logical Mind EDUCATED Out of Them.But my Mom who only had Gr 2 taught Her 12 RC Kids "Believe NONE of What you HEAR and HALF of What you SEE". Oh and she always told us to USE the Good Common Sense the Good Lord gave ya.
It is impossible for a plane like this to penetrate a building like that without coming apart. However, that is exactly what happens.
The third law of motion is that every action must have an equal or opposite reaction and that indicates that the result of the plane hitting the building should be the same as the building hitting the plane. The plane could not withstand that impact. It must have been timed and executed for explosions to open the face of the building to allow such penetration..
Basic physics. Whenever rigid bodies come into contact with each other at a high velocity there is a transfer of kenetic energy to heat energy.
A missile being fired 10 feet from impact? Yeah right are you joking when each aircraft was traveling at over 400 mph you think that a missile was fired aproximately 10 feet from impact? It would have been so much easier just to fill the plane's cargo hold with explosives.
Basic physics. Whenever rigid bodies come into contact with each other at a high velocity there is a transfer of kenetic energy to heat energy.
A missile being fired 10 feet from impact? Yeah right are you joking when each aircraft was traveling at over 400 mph you think that a missile was fired aproximately 10 feet from impact? It would have been so much easier just to fill the plane's cargo hold with explosives.
If it was an explosion how would one explain the expertise of the terrorists in piloting the plane to impact precisely on the point of explosion?
If the planes were guided and those spots of light were beacons or similar the beacons would of had to have been constantly on to guide the plane. How would it make sense that the beacons don't have to be on until basically right at the time of impact?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
The third law of motion is that every action must have an equal or opposite reaction and that indicates that the result of the plane hitting the building should be the same as the building hitting the plane. The plane could not withstand that impact. It must have been timed and executed for explosions to open the face of the building to allow such penetration..
Are you blind?
Nose is made of fiberglass.
Spark is not evident when engines hit
Spark is on one side toward bottom in both plane hits
Damn this is stupid.
Basic physics. Whenever rigid bodies come into contact with each other at a high velocity there is a transfer of kenetic energy to heat energy.
A missile being fired 10 feet from impact? Yeah right are you joking when each aircraft was traveling at over 400 mph you think that a missile was fired aproximately 10 feet from impact? It would have been so much easier just to fill the plane's cargo hold with explosives.
This video is full of bs
Basic physics. Whenever rigid bodies come into contact with each other at a high velocity there is a transfer of kenetic energy to heat energy.
A missile being fired 10 feet from impact? Yeah right are you joking when each aircraft was traveling at over 400 mph you think that a missile was fired aproximately 10 feet from impact? It would have been so much easier just to fill the plane's cargo hold with explosives.
This video is full of bs
If the planes were guided and those spots of light were beacons or similar the beacons would of had to have been constantly on to guide the plane. How would it make sense that the beacons don't have to be on until basically right at the time of impact?