The Real Buzz on if We Landed on the Moon in '69

Buzz answers the world as to whether or not a manned mission to the moon happend in 1969.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• moon
• landing
• conspiracy
• buzz
• aldrin
• neil
• armstrong
• space
• NASA
• punch
• smash
• bam

[chuggachuggawoowoo]

Idiots who say we didn't land on the moon have no lives. All the evidence in the world wouldn't change their minds because they want to believe in stupid crap. Aldrin should have stabbed him.

[stratocaster539]

One small punch for Buzz - one giant lesson for sibrel.

[vlad9vt]

very easy to refute NASA program . firstly any physicist saw their video with rovers on the surface of the moon-say it is from within the Earth's gravity - as the sand that comes out from under the wheels of the rover-acting strictly as in the Earth's gravity and atmosphere.

Further on the moon as well as in open space rather high radiation - open space and solar radiation - the astronauts for 10 days outside the limits of earth's magnetic field would receive lethal doses of irradiation.

[jtkirkfan2002]

@shotokanbb We went back five times, six if you count Apollo 13. We never went back due to funding.

[jtkirkfan2002]

Don't ever tell a man who was strapped to the top of the most powerful rocket ever built that he is a "coward".

[jacksawild]

Right cross, Buzz.

Age does not weary him.

[shotokanbb]

Yes, in fact there was a landing in the moon, but who started the hoax conspiracy?? yes the US Government, but why? They don't want you to know what they have found there...in the moon. And you ask why we didn`t go back???

[DalekHunter1994]

ALDRIN...PAWNCH!!!

[amievery1]

My response to the video makes sense in certain aspects of the video in itself. Only few eyes can spot truth. When you imagine of being in space and make your own experiments you will fail to be out there because it is not possible. There will be people out there who will outsmart your moves so therefore you are screwed up no offence.

[danschaoticmind]

@RevengeofShinobi1 So, unless if you actually have evidence which contradicts evidence posited, you are pulling at straws.

"Extraordinary claims require extra-ordinary evidence"

My claim: we went to the moon

definative proof: telemetry records from not only our own countries, but countries such as the soviet union and australia (spare me "they are our allies" arguments)

[danschaoticmind]

@RevengeofShinobi1 Furthermore, you are pulling at straws here. You assert we never landed on the moon. Yet I have presented the fact that there is evidence which suggests our own enemies at the time (You are likely too young to remember the so called cold war) confirmed we had in fact landed on the moon. If we didn't that would be the greatest advantage they could hold.

Take for example, the bay of pigs incident.

However, No matter what evidence is presented, you will deny or ignore it.