Michael Finley Sick Game Winning Three Pointer VS Spurs 1 23 09
Uploader Comments (QuickcutLA)
Top Comments
-
It was not a gme winner, but a great play to finish the game for the Spurs. I know because I was at this game, Spurs play that play 100 or more times when it comes down to winning the game.
All Comments (30)
-
@humblephil WRONG, You need to learn basic phonics and go back to school. If you had actually read what I wrote, I said that, "I didnt know if the nets scored after this hoop but If they scored even 1pt. then Finleys shot would have counted as the game winner" His shot put them up 4 meaning they were up 1 before the shot. The next nets possession they are down 4 if they score even 1 pt they are down 3. Without the Fins 3 the game is tied. Fins shot is the game winner in that scenario.
-
Something else to consider. Finley's shot put them up 4 points. The Spurs won by 3, but scored 4 points the rest of the way. There is NO WAY that the Spurs won that game on that shot, when they won 94-91. It made it unlikely they'd lose, but calling this a game winner when they still had to score 4 more points to seal it for good does NOT make this a game winner.
-
@PweezyG81 WRONG. It was a 4 point lead and they ALREADY were in the lead. If Finley had scored the bucket before that as well, then the bucket that put them ahead by one point would have been the game winner. This shot simply sealed the deal. It did NOT win the game. You need to learn basic addition and subtraction. The game winning shot was the shot that game the Spurs the lead, not Finley's shot. It sealed the game, but it did NOT WIN the game.
-
That is Michael Finley, VS the NETS. Not VS the SPURS. Learn to title your video correctly.
-
As much hate as he gets in SA later on he hit some huge timely threes for them! He was a clutch shooter.
-
@humblephil I didnt know if the nets scored but if they had even scored 1 pt. then Finleys shot goes down as the game winning hoop. Game winners are not always last second buzzer beaters buddy. Up your knowledge before you open that mouth again. You can hit game winners this way all the time. Its just not as exciting as the buzzer beaters.
-
@PweezyG81 No, it was not. It made it a 4pt lead. IF the Nets scored?? They did not score again, and even if they did score another basket, it does not win them the game because the Spurs were already AHEAD. Game winners, are either when you are behind or tied, not when they extend the lead. Maybe a game-clinching jumper, but NOT a game-winning jumper.
-
@humblephil If the Spurs scored even one pt after that shot with 22 seconds left then, yes that was the game winner.
-
Gilbert walks in Arenas CJ ran for Miles
Tim did some Duncan
John climbed a Wall OJ ate some Mayo
Kevin is in Love
Derrick smells like a Rose Stephen ate some Curry David went out West
-
@QuickcutLA actually no, coz just keeping possession would have won the game, they didnt need to score
That was not a game winner. The Spurs were already up 1 point. So the 3ptr, made it a 4 point lead for the Spurs. Clutch shot, but NOT a game winner.
humblephil 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ACtually, it's a game winner because it sealed net's chances.
QuickcutLA 3 years ago