AB 2072 is an OPPORTUNITY!

This message is for deaf people in California. You were told that AB 2072 was a bad bill. It's a typical response coming from a closed society filled with people who simply do not know how to compete in this world. Instead, they shoot down the things they do not understand or saw as a threat. In reality, this bill is a darn good bill. I saw it as an excellent opportunity to tell the world what we wanted them to know about our language and culture. I simply don't understand why some of your so-called leaders fumbled on this one. It's probably high time they were replaced.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• deaf bilingual coalition
• GLAD
• DCARA
• ab2072
• ab 2072
• deaf education
• deaf
• deaf culture
• gallaudet university
• california
• CAD
• deafvideo.tv
• deaf video
• deaf read
• deafread.com
• american sign language
• asl
• deaf club
• audism free america
• dbc
• deafhood
• legislative bill
• audism

[Salticid68]

Well, I don't have as much energy and ambition as yours. I may be quick to assume, but it seems that you don't include all of my comments here. The point is that AB 2072 represses ASL rather than gives the parents of deaf children the truth. Just in case if you make profit from CI industries, you'll have a guilty conscious later on. You won't want that. If I'm wrong, then my apology. I just know that I'm not wrong about ASL. Nice to know you. God bless you.

[theHolism]

@Salticid68 As far as I know I've not rejected any of your comments. Forgive me if I'm mistaken. I do reject some comments that did not reflect healthy discussion and may have mistaken that one for somebody else. I respectfully disagree about AB 2073 and how it represses ASL. I do not see CI as a profit venture but somebody has to get paid for developing such technology and installing them just like people in the ASL industry get paid for teaching publishing, selling and teaching ASL.

[theHolism]

@Salticid68 It's just that ASL is not as big of a money making machine as CI is but it's not their fault.  Medical technology is expensive no matter what it is. CI is no different. God bless you as well.

[deafcuban]

Thanks for reading the bill AB 2072 three times. I appreciate your times and efforts to express your opinion on this vlog. I admire your honesty and intelligence. You are a true hero serving the deaf community in general. God bless you.

[netrox]

Wow, seems like you're a pragmatic guy!

[californiadeaf]

It'll be a turkey shoot this time. The facts are the good bullets to use against the sitting ducks of deaf culture ideology.

[Salticid68]

I'm curious...what is your view on audism?

[Salticid68]

@theHolism Whew! I have energy back. I guess I forgot to sleep. Lol. Yes, I agree on that. Believe me, pharmacy companies overcharge us. They charge a prescription pills to farmers for a sheep's heart worm 100 times cheaper than they charge the same pill to us for something I forgot. If you're interested, you can research. I'm not very excellent with google search like which I should type "overcharge pills", "pharmacy companies overcharge us", or whatever.

[Salticid68]

@theHolism It's nice to know that you won't take a penny for that. Just a few comments were missing. Maybe I'm mistaken. I didn't count my comments. Yes, they see us as medical term. Deaf can be hereditary. It's not recessive nor dominant gene. As for infection, we need that once in a while to strengthen our immune system. I learned at biology 101 that if you use antibacterial soap excessively, your immune system will be weaken. I don't care for that. I just concern about CI.

[theHolism]

@Salticid68 Ha ha... I would not take a pretty penny for anything that has to do with deafness. Never have and never will. It's a cause I find worthy to review, discuss, debate and fight for. Not about money for me. Not at all. I'm sure there were some unfortunate incidents but there are many different factors that could cause it, including infections. I'm not a doctor so I don't pass judgement on anything.