Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ian Juby's egregious quote mine regarding 14C

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
220 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 28, 2011

How do people still take this guy seriously? The bad part is after I pointed this out to him directly, he claimed the accelerated decay was referring to accelerated 14C decay.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Thanks for posting this TSF, it is sad that Juby-fans will not actually take a look and see how dishonest this kind of sourcing really is.

  • @LithodidMan He undoubtedly saw it, I tried to post it as a reply to his video but he didn't accept it.

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wait, so hes a lying, quote mining, hypocritical creationist? are not they all?

  • @machinedean100 That's not put in laymens terms, that's a complete misrepresentation. Background 14C is only part of it, nitrogen enriched via uranium-thorium series decay can be converted into 14C

  • @machinedean100 Yet you're still ignorant in geology, sad.

  • Ok I am going to put thus in super laymens terms again. So, everyone can understand it. There is no radio carbon in the one stuff. There is some radio carbon n some other stuff. So, we are going to use that stuff to make up a date for the diamonds. IN the fifth sentence they state they measured some stuff in the diamonds after they already stated they could not.So, with other stuff there gonna just make up some stuff.

  • @TheScienceFoundation I have talked to thousands just like you also.

  • @machinedean100 Not personally but I've talked to thousands just like you.

  • @machinedean100 No, given my first statement, my second statement is completely accurate. You have no idea what the articles talking about and you very clearly have no idea about processes that can produce anomalous 14C

  • @machinedean100 You do realize that this is from a creationist article right? They weren't going to give any explanation they didn't have to for aberrant 14C but they had to be legitimate and accurate for their work to even be considered.

  • Potholer and I quote there's no mother %&$@in carbon in it.

  • @TheScienceFoundation Apparently your not familiar with the machinedean!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more