Chapter 2 Do I need a license

the final part to a really informative talk showing you the truth that has been hidden for so long
search
charlie sprinkle on youtube
peace

Category:

Education

Tags:

• license
• lawful
• freedom
• commerce
• statute
• consent

[takotheoktopus]

I don't consent to either a book of codes, rules and regulations written by man and that includes the one that you claim the Queen defends. I do not take up faith in the bible (another book written by man) and refuse to submit to any authority and that includes a magical father figure in the sky. Do you have any advice on how one can be a free man on the land without submitting to religious dogma?

[psychodrilla]

@takotheoktopus write your own bible

bible means truth

and its not about dogmas its what you hold as truth

as my family bible

a bible is just another word for history or truth

i'm no christian but i have my family bible

and minister to all humans in need

hope this is of some help

peace

[takotheoktopus]

@psychodrilla Thanks for the reply.

Bible does not mean truth. Bible refers to a book that is a collection of religious writing. The Bible is full of falsehoods, which are the opposite of the truth. What I hold as truth is that which has been proven to be fact or reality. The bible fails to meet this criteria. The Bible is used as authoritative text by those who weld it and is not to be disputed, much like other books of codes, rules and regulations that the state promotes.

[psychodrilla]

@takotheoktopus that is your definition of bible

but my research has led me to believe that when i say bible i mean truth in past times when you swore on something known as a bible

it was your book of family history and traditions

you can remain blinded by your anger because of those who have twisted words and abused their perceived authority

or learn about the history of the family bible

you are talking of the christian 'holy' bible

i talk of my families bible something totally different

[takotheoktopus]

@psychodrilla

Care to elaborate where you are getting the impression that I'm, as you put it "blinded by... anger"? One could argue that it is you who has twisted words. Once again, the Bible, family owned or not is far from the truth and is not the go to guide worth swearing an oath on. Let's get back to discussing my main question and I'll try to be more clear. Do you have any advice on how one can be a free man on the land without submitting to religious text like the person in this video?

[psychodrilla]

@takotheoktopus look you were born free

you are free

you don't become a 'freeman on the land'

you just seem to be looking for an argument

you say i'm wrong in the same sentence you say"which is a book considered authoritative in its field."

so there for your family bible would not need to have any mention of invisible sky pixies or such things in the 'holy' bible

it just needs to have the facts about you and yours

why are you finding it so difficult to comprehend?i think you maybe a shill

[psychodrilla]

right

now if you do a claim of right etc where will you write it? where will your children keep it to prove they are not a member of the corporation?

where will they keep their proof that they are your property and you theirs?

in a book is my advice so if you attend court you can say this is my truth my book considered authoritative in its field and i swear upon it

you can flounder on the 'religious' text bullshit all you want

remain distracted by it not my problem

peace

[takotheoktopus]

@psychodrilla

You should have specified in your previous comment that you meant family bible. I know what a family bible is. It's still a book containing religious text, it also includes a families genealogy and such. I'm assuming you are using the second most common definition of the word Bible, which is a book considered authoritative in its field. Whether your research has led you to believe that the bible means truth doesn't change the fact that you are wrong.

[antichrist1909589]

anyone know where i can find a list of what needs to be done to be able to tavel freely within the borders of the USA. It is hard for me to make sense of a lot of the information i find much is legal and court lingo.

[psychodrilla]

@Tango198817 well if you accepted the fixed penalty you have accepted the obligation to pay you should not have given any details then you would not have made yourself liable

if it was a council warden who accosted you he had no authority you gave him your authority

if it was a PCSO once again he had no authority til you gave it to him

you had commited no crime but you accepted the offer to give details and pay the fine sorry no way out unless you never signed anything