I worried about you! You arrived one second late in the New Year, courtesy of some time shift phenomenon. Meaning that you missed one of the major events in Washington for lack of anything else going on there lately: The Goldfinger show-down. You can relax: Area 51 is in uproar, again. Uproar over an appointment of a Senator by a Governor who was arrested but not convicted, against whom no indictment has been obtained, and who so far has not been impeached, and who had the audacity to appoint a tan Obama successor. Whether you like it or not, it looks like Goldfinger will be with us for a long time to come. Oh, and for those who are unfamiliar with my irreverence, Goldfinger is Illinois Governor Blagojevich and Area 51 is Washington, DC. It is interesting how some Senators are incapable of sticking to the issues at hand, there are only a few. --- First Issue is whether a sitting Illinois Governor who appointed somebody to the Senate has the authority to do so. The answer is of course YES, as Illinois law clearly says so. The law is much less specific when it comes to impeachment.
If the Senate, the Illinois Secretary of State, or the Illinois legislator didnt want the sitting Governor to appoint former state Attorney General Roland Burris they could have changed the law or at least tried to impeach Goldfinger. As of this moment, they did neither. Conclusion: Blagojevich is the elected Governor. --- The next issue is why the Illinois legislator drags its feet to come to a decision whether or not to impeach Blago. Could it be that the Illinois Constitution or whatever law applies is wishy washy about it? The fact is that Goldfinger as of this moment has not only not been indicted but - contrary to Patrick Fitzgeralds former statements - the prosecutors case appears to be so weak that he had to ask for a 90 days extension to even SEEK an indictment. Frankly for a moment I saw the light at the end of the tunnel when Fitzgerald had Blago arrested: Finally somebody who goes after corruption. Dream on! --- The third issue is why the Senate exposes itself to the accusation of racism, given the fact that there is currently no black Senator and the one just appointed has an impeccable record. At least that is his statement. Whether the Illinois Secretary of State knows better is another issue. --- As to Congress and Senate I am amazed about the incompetence to analyze, let alone comprehend even the most simple legal issue.
Lets look for a moment at the issue of felon Senators. Dont we know dozens of cases where Senators or Congressmen have been indicted and convicted, yet were tolerated to continue in their office. --- I ran a Google Search and in .7 seconds it came up with over 1 million hits, not counting Stevens and Craig. One Million! Talking about Crime Family! --- Take the case of Alaska Republican Senator Ted Stevens. He was INDICTED of having failed to report gifts on July 29, 2008. On October 27, 2008 he was found guilty yet not only continued his office but ran for re-election, which he lost only because his conviction was too much even for Alaskans. Unless of course Alaska elections are run on Diebold equipment, if you get my drift. --- Or take Republican Senator Larry Craig who couldnt keep his fingers to himself in a public restroom. He was convicted after pleading guilty to disorderly conduct, but later tried to unsuccessfully withdraw his plea. Was he removed from office? Nope. Though he didnt run for re-election in 2008. --- In the House, in turn, Democrat William Jefferson of Louisiana was indicted on bribery charges but continued his work in Congress until he was finally defeated in the 2008 election. True, he was stripped of his committee positions, but otherwise left unchallenged. --- Republican Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas was indicted in 1994 on tampering with evidence. She was not forced to resign and was eventually acquitted. --- So what is the uproar about the appointment of Roland Burris to the Senate all about? Because he was appointed by Blago who at this moment has not even been indicted? Or is it as some say because Burris is an African American I hate the term lets call him a TAN person. No offense, but African-American is a racist term. Either he is American or he is not. I mean, am I a European-American?
--- Back to the issue: Is this whole thing about racism or is it because the Republicans want a special election in Illinois, which could yield a Republican Governor? If by nothing else then by Diebold voting equipment. By the way, Burris is going to court and if everything is above board he will win. As to you, ladies and gentlemen, I wish you a prosperous, maybe even happy New Year. By the way, I am looking into producing a documentary on the Bush Legacy, with some more material to be included. The documentary would be distributed by Amazon via its on-demand video section. Any comments are most welcome.
Loading...
2:29
humans working along side aliens at area 51by superemposed2,186,878 views
Seems im learning more then ever in life through the wisdom of others like yourself sir. For the majority of my life i was under the sleep spell of the media being the truth. Each day after the weather on telivison i turn off the TV and use the net. Through the perceptions of others i know more of whats actualy happening in the world and here at home then the CFR mandated Corporate Conflict of interest Media provides. Excellant Vid 5 stars and subed.
cycimian 2 years ago
Well, I AM watching the media precisely to get more material fthat fir into the spider web of lies - and to experience the enjoyment of dispelling the lies - thanks for your comment
bvongrabe 2 years ago
may the madness
...not ...
find it's way
to your door
this year..
peace out
chena3 3 years ago
Well, I don't know - that would mean I have nothing to write, complain, or video clip about
:)
bvongrabe 3 years ago