Complete Creation, 2nd Ed., Part 12 with Wazooloo

http://wazooloo.com
http://genesisweek.com
http://ianjuby.org
Part 12 of the "Complete Creation" series with Ian Juby. An exhaustive look at the Creation/Evolution debate. In this episode, Ian continues discussion on how time is actually the enemy of the plot and biology is evolution's worst enemy.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• creation
• science
• museum
• Ian
• Juby
• evolution
• age
• of
• the
• earth
• fossil
• biology
• 777quip
• funny
• wazooloo

[sweatytoothmadman]

Design does not mean designer, creationist tried that logic on the rainbow a few hundred years back due to the fact that all the colors followed a certain pattern and made a half circle, and so they deduced that every time you see a rainbow god had made it. Of course now we understand the physical properties of the rainbow and how they are formed.

[wazooloo]

the complexity of a rainbow has no bearing on the complexity of even the "simplest" of cells (even though there is no such thing as a "simple cell").

[sweatytoothmadman]

You took the Law of Biogenesis out of context all that Pasteur concluded was the multi-cellular life cannot come from organic compounds, which I would agree with.

[wazooloo]

Can you cite an observed example of life arising from non-life?

[sweatytoothmadman]

"It takes 30,000 proteins to make just the tail of the flagellum" who said the flagellum was formed from organic compounds during earths begins, again life wasn't anywhere near as complex in the beginning as it is today.

[wazooloo]

I did not mean to imply that the bacteria (and its flagellum) was the first life; I was merely pointing out how complex organisms were - even the "simple" ones. I will clarify in the final video (it will have an "corrections" section); but even the "simplest" of organisms still requires tremendous numbers of proteins, thus the point is still valid. Thanks for commenting.

[9pt9]

evolution = pwned

[RationalEmotive]

Proving faith by science! I love it!

[9pt9]

@9pt9 Oh it is quite the case. No fossils, no beneficial mutations, no mechanism. PWNED!!!!

[odinata]

@9pt9

Funny how its not the case at all.....

[odinata]

@ishaofpistis1

Oh, I see. the fact that foxes are related to wolves is a vast conspiracy....

Idiot.

[Eaglewing17]

hallelujah

[nicholighkun]

What about the DNA repair robots? And the fact that there have never been known examples of positive mutations, which add information? Plus the repair robots come and remove the mutations.

[ishaofpistis1]

"Evolution needs the mutations, but the repair mechanism removes the mutations". Evolution is impossible because of this fact alone. The fact that abiogenesis is impossible really destroys the foundation of evolution theory, but this destroys the mechanism that should be driving evolution. This can't be covered up any longer, people will learn the truth, or deny it willfully.

[Iraqveterankill4real]

@RationalEmotive Science and God compliment one another astoundingly. God made it that way I am certain of that.

[coolvideo28]

The Truth

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day