Creationism on Huffington Post. My interview part 4/6.

This interview was conducted by the team at Agnostic Salvation Hour. The audio can be found here: http://agnosticsalvation.podomatic.com/

David Klinghoffer, from the Discovery Institute wrote an article with the usual ignorance and dishonest displayed by those at the DI.

His article from HuffPo can be found here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-klinghoffer/the-dark-side-of-darwinis_b_630­627.html)

This list of logical fallacies and butchered science is taken apart in this interview. Its a good listen as it answers many of creationists claims, and is entertaining as well. Enjoy!

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Discovery
• institute
• david
• klinghoffer
• huffington
• post
• intelligent
• design
• theory
• of
• evolution
• donexodus
• darwin
• dawkins
• religion
• agnostic
• salvation
• hour
• radio
• podcast
• creationists
• creotards
• dishonesty
• logical
• fallacies
• knuckledragging
• toolbags

[BlowDevilUp]

Catalytic not 'cataclysmic' your using 'enzymatic activity' was a good recovery though.

[DonExodus2]

@BlowDevilUp Given my BAC at the time, Im content with it lol

[baraqiyal]

@DonExodus2 Do you have a drinking problem? I'm not criticizing because I know I do.

[DonExodus2]

@baraqiyal Not a "problem" :P

[antonyneal]

Jesus fucking Christ the clarity of your memory is very impressive.

[DonExodus2]

@antonyneal Which part?

[proudfootz]

A creationist wouldn't know a transition species if one bit them in the ass.

[fractal420]

Big fail on Huffington Post to allow that clearly one sided, biased article being published in their journal.

[nash984954]

@Mogley52, you are another creationist thinking without the proper equipment. The IRC does no science. Where are all of the biologists poeer reviewed papers on creationism, there are none, whereas evolution has a track record of 150 years of folks trying to find fault with evolution&disprove it, it hasn't happened yet, s**thead. Shouting louder than others doesn't make your argument any more true. Creationism's only argument is,"evolution isn't true, therefore creationism is," u r a mooncalf!

[srexob715]

@Mogley52  Stupid TROLL!

[proudfootz]

@Antimidation

You're quite correct!

[Antimidation]

@proudfootz Clearly because any fossil they have seen is transitional :)

[Drgamedood]

@Mogley52 fuck off. 

[esplin946686]

@Mogley52  Typing in caps is not going to make your argument any more valid.

[Mogley52]

DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at ICR, The Institute for Creation Research. They only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, and WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!

[Mogley52]

INTELLIGENT DESIGN: IF YOU DISCOVERED A SAND CASTLE ON A LONELY BEACH, YOU CAN’T PROVE THAT IT WAS MADE BY EITHER CHANCE OR DESIGN. NO ONE OBSERVED ITS ORIGINS. EITHER IT WAS DESIGNED OR THE RANDOM FORCES OF WIND AND WAVES MADE THE CASTLE. YOU FIND NO FINGERPRINTS. DID THE WIND WIPE AWAY THE FINGERPRINTS? BUT, HOW DO WE KNOW THERE WERE FINGERPRINTS IN THE FIRST PLACE? BY CHANCE OR DESIGN? BOTH SIDES SHOULD BE FREE TO PRESENT THEIR CASE! READ MY ARTICLE "HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM."

[Mogley52]

APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE