Phil Jones at the UK Parliament, 1 March 2010 [1/5]
Top Comments
All Comments (33)
-
Interrigator: "Have you done anything wrong"?
Jones: "No"
Interrigator: "Oh, OK. Sorry about the inconvenience, and thanks for coming in, bye".
-
Jones perpetuates the arrogant myth that this small club of scientists should have the right to interfere with, and ultimately veto, the review and publication process for each and every paper published in their field. Such censorship is not how a healthy discipline of science operates; indeed, any discipline that operates in this manner is not “science” at all.
-
Big red taxi, where do you get 95% from? There are thousands of scientists who dont follow you political mantra. Anybody can pull a figure like 95% out of the air. Consensus is not science it is politics. The greatest scientists were the ones who went against consensus.
-
Phil "Hide the decline" Jones
His data is almost as bad as his combover
-
Not asking him very hard questions are they? Looks like a boys club. Mates looking after mates. They already beleive everything this guy is saying. They are all AGW zealots. This "interview" is a massive wank.
-
@bigredtaxi The sun is not a constant heat source. It fluctuates in strength, which causes natural variability in the climate system over long periods of time.
-
@bigredtaxi you just proved how stupid you are...did you get your education in the U.S.A.
-
The sun! are you for real? How the hell can the sun be making the earth progressivly hotter, when it is the sun that is shrinking in size, and losing power?
-
@bigredtaxi pulling bullshit %'s out of your ass,doesnt make it true...the sun is the major cause of the earth warming...not humans
This is an example on how 100,000 men do the work of 1 and get the wrong answer every time, both in calculations and meetings. The secret is, which is no secret anymore, that the whole climate circus is a dictators' money circus and nothing else.
OttoLund 2 years ago 13
Thank you for posting these. Phil Jones' obtuseness on the question of why he wouldn't share the raw data with scientists who want to try to reproduce his results convinces me that he is not really a scientist. A real scientist wants to get at facts, and has no reason to hide any part of his or her research.
courtesyZone 2 years ago 8