The Bible:A reliable historical document

I've found this clip on "joshdotro's channel".Is the bible a reliable historical document or is it just a book of false and blind claims?Can we trust it?Has it been modifed through time?Are there things taken out from it?Let's find out...

Am gasit acest clip pe canalul lui joshdotro.Este biblia un document istoric de incredere sau doar o carte cu afirmatii false si oarbe?Putem avea incredere in ea?A fost modificata in timp?Exista lucruri scoase din biblie?Hai sa aflam...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• bible
• truth
• God
• jews
• gentiles
• manuscripts
• Dumnezeu
• biblia
• real
• history
• istorie
• creation
• creatie
• source
• christianity
• belive
• devil
• gospel
• creationism
• prophecy
• exists
• evolution

[wizard970]

@kenpca Really?? You seem to be living in a fantasy world. It would seem someone would have noticed all these things, and wrote just a couple of words about it, but nothing. Because they never happened. The entire book is propaganda, written solely to influence people. And in your case it seems to have worked very well.

[kenpca]

@wizard970 But the Bible does record these events....that is historical documentation!

[wizard970]

@kenpca Things Roman historians seem to have missed, as they did not write one word about them.

Jesus triumphant entry into Jerusalem, the entire town comes out to greet him.

Harrods slaughter of the baby boys in Bethlehem.

Jesus casts out the money changers. The Temple complex was 35 acres (could fit 34 football fields) and protected by armed guards.

After Jesus' death, 2 earth quakes, darkness covers the entire region,

mass resurrection of holly people in Jerusalem

[kenpca]

@wizard970 It is expected for non believers to NOT believe the contents of the NT. Its a matter of the heart & faith in the existence of God & his involvement in historical events. Paul lived during the time of the Apostles & the contemporary followers of Christ. The evidence shows they (including Peter) received Paul's writings as scripture. There's no evidence to the contrary. We have ample historical document evidence. The only reason some people reject it is because of its spiritual content.

[kenpca]

@wizard970 All of the new Testament was written after his death my friend. Just as all other biographies are written after the death of the one who they wrote about. That is common practice and does not prove your point at all. So if an official "historian" wrote about Christ would that cause you to believe the Gospel & become a Christian? Many documents that confirm historical events are not written by "historians". The NT is all the documentation needed to confirm the existence of Jesus.

[kenpca]

@wizard970 No, you mis represent what I am saying. One of the evidences in history of any event comes not only from those that are in support of the event but also those who are antagonists. There are antagonists who speak about Christians and confirm certain aspects of their beliefs and behavior....although they didn't like christians. What I am saying is simple...where are the critics to dispute what Paul & the NT writers wrote? The Bible IS documentation.

[wizard970]

@kenpca So now you want people to write about things that did not happen??? How silly is that? And the problem is a lot of writers wrote about all kinds of things during that period, it is one of the best documented times in history. Jesus is never mentioned, only in the Bible.

[wizard970]

@kenpca No historian who lived during Christ's lifetime wrote about him. Including one who lived less than two miles away. The writings of the New

Testament were almost all written by Paul, who never met the living Christ and wrote after his death. Not only is the New Testament not true, the entire book is a fairy tale. Do some research.

[kenpca]

@wizard970 If the same historical tests are applied to the Bible as other pieces of literature...we then have an abundance of evidence Jesus lived! We have literature written by those who lived during the time of Christ such as Peter! The Rest of the NT was also written within the lifetime of Christ's contemporaries! There was ample opportunity for rebuttal of these writings by other contemporaries....but where are they?

[kenpca]

@wizard970 Aside from all the evidence you are ignoring....where are all the writings of those who "knew" that these things didn't take place. Surely someone would have refuted The writings of the New Testament if they were not true! The NT was not written "during" the life of Christ like other biographies! However they were written shortly afterwards during the lives of Christ's contemporaries that did live during his life, such as the apostles. The Apostles & others did notice!