ontological
Uploader Comments (headlessprofessor)
All Comments (34)
-
If you define something, it doesn't make it real... Your definition could have been based upon your imagination and not an objective reality.
-
Yes, I have said it in over 200 videos on youtube, a dozen books, and several hundred articles, reviews and presentations.. If you want more customized responses to your comments you should become a student in one of my classes or submit an article to one of the journals on which I serve on the editorial board.
-
Is that all you have to say?
-
man's court?
-
If you believe in God you are not fit to educate. Because your mind has been comprised by the character flaws which have led to your abandonment of reason and subscription to irrational and unsubstantiated fairy tails.
-
Then all educators are "insane" for we ask our students to do that. We achieve that (at least when the student is not closed minded) by expanding cognitive structures.
By the way, you are using a popular, rather than a technical definition of insanity.
That point was addressed by Anselm a thousand years ago.
headlessprofessor 7 months ago
If I understood the concluding point of the video, the perceived need to worship and obey something is an argument for the existence of a personal god, correct?
MySocksSmell2 1 year ago
@MySocksSmell2 I would refine the statement, replacing "argument" with "need." My concluding point dealt more with the irrelevance of arguments like the ontological. Such arguments are not likely to win many converts.
headlessprofessor 1 year ago