'Hate Crimes' Laws Sowing the Seeds of Terror

Frank Gaffney on Fox News discusses Hizb Ut-Tahrir, the Muslim Brotherhood and the consequences of so-called 'hate crimes' legislation opening the door to shariah-influenced blasphemy laws.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Frank
• Gaffney
• Hizb
• Ut-Tahrir
• Shariah
• Muslim
• Brotherhood
• Fox
• News

[mooninquirer]

I never thought that I would be agreeing with a Zionist Jewish neo-con, like Frank Gaffney here. But I agree, we should NOT have the hate crimes laws. Ted Pike ( google : TRUTHTELLERS ), leading the fight against the hate crimes laws, which will ban free speech, has noted that a number of Jews have come out against them. But the driving force behind them is the Jewish ADL ( google : TED PIKE LATE LAWS )

Gentile Americans are losing what they have right now, because of the wars !

[Kurtlane]

No, America is not perfect. But do you want it to become like Afghanistan under Taliban?

Don't be such a spoiled brat. Appreciate what you have, or you'll lose it.

[Kurtlane]

What goals? Here is a quote from Omar Ahmed, co-founder of CAIR and chairman of its board:

"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran ... should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth"

(Speech to California Muslims in July 1998)

[Kurtlane]

No, hate crime legislation has everything to do with terrorism, including taking over the country.

At Fort Hood, there were advanced warnings of Nidal Malik Hasan going jihadist but officers in charge did nothing to him, because they feared being accused of hate crimes.

What better illustration that hate crimes have to do with terror can there be?

Groups like CAIR are engaged in justifying every act of terrorism and suppressing every beep of truth about them and their goals.

(cont.)

[Kurtlane]

OK, so the world doesn't split this way absolutely perfectly. But does the world ever split perfectly?

Talk about viewing things too simplistically is often used to drown everything in complexity and thus impose total paralysis and block all action. I don't buy this approach.

Yes, things can be viewed too simplistically, but they can also be overcomplicated. To a degree, one can generalize.

[ProfMike789]

It's fiction. The real world doesn't split into ZOMG EVIL ISLAM/NAZIS and FUCK YEAH PERFECT AMERICA so easily.

On top of that, hate crime legislation has nothing to do with terrorists somehow taking over the country.

[Kurtlane]

I think it might help you to watch this video:

watch?v=xFmVtZLnHio

Granted, it's a fiction movie and not everything is related to present. But even in this little trailer there are plenty of excelent questions about unpreparedness that are even more relevant today.

There's a scene in that movie when someone who used to demand evidence of Japanese intentions to attack the US is told, "Evidence! Here is your evidence!" as he is shown burning Pearl Harbor.

[Kurtlane]

Scaremongering? There's not nearly enough scaremongering!

The way we are going, Islamonazis keep winning and winning, things are getting worse and worse. Especially in "stealth jihad" area.

If we keep behaving like this, Islamonazis will conquer the world and establish their worldwide Caliphate.

Wait till nukes start dropping. Then you won't talk of unnecessary scaremongering.

[cmonopoly72]

Thanks.

[C0ct0pusPrime]

actually, you defined biased instead of just using the word, genius.