CVT means Continuously Variable Transmission. Unlike a standard transmission, which has several fixed ratios to choose between, a CVT has pretty much infinite ratios. This means smoother acceleration, better power delivery, and less loss of power due to shifting and clutching than a normal trans.
CVTs are nothing new. Dodge has a CVT (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VYPsrOyIdw&feature=fvwrel) that's belt driven and uses variable pulleys. NuVinci has a bike hub (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Smijjy832X0&feature=related) that uses swivelling balls and some kind of grippy fluid. Simkinetics (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd2-vsTzd9E&feature=related) has a pretty interesting design as well, which looks quite similar to this design except that it uses cams (?) instead of pendulums.
I like this design because it's relatively robust. It doesn't need special fluids, it doesn't rely on friction, and even in Lego it works pretty well. There may be a better design out there (the Simkinetics hub looks promising), but this system seems like a good place for me to start tinkering.
To see the Wikipedia write-up on what I'm trying to replicate, go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinesco_(automobile) or here to read about the inventor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Constantinescu or here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Constantinesco_torque_converter for the pics I worked from.
I built this from two Lego Mindstorms kits (1.5 and 2.0), one Ultimate Accessory pack, a few bits from some monkey kit thing, and a few other bits and pieces I had laying around. Your mileage may vary depending on what parts you have at your disposal. None of the parts were modified, and the only non-Lego part is the string.
Questions/comments welcome.
good work,d have you checked out the rexresearch page on him yet?
boyd868b 3 months ago
@boyd868b The what now?
Darwinpasta 3 months ago
Hey man, nice build. Anyway, I was wondering if you can adjust the motor rpm. I would be curious to see what happens at lower rpms .
My concern is that if you reduce the rpm's to 1/4 let's say (the equivalent ratio between the drive and idle rpms in a real car) there will still be a lot of torque in that wheel so you would need quite a strong hand brake to keep a car stationary.
Now I know that the guy actually built the car and it worked fine but I would like to see it too. :)
caesareor 4 months ago
@caesareor Thanks. Yeah, torque would be an issue, unless the motor was really slow. Given the idle speed of a gasoline engine, it would need a clutch to stop it from fighting against the handbrake. In fact I think I'd set up a CVT much like a standard auto trans, with the torque converter feeding a few clutch packs. This would also provide for underdrive gears and reverse.
I've dismantled this one to attempt a dual-pendulum setup. I'll try slow input with that one if I get it working.
Darwinpasta 4 months ago