Debunking Screw Loose Change: The Movie 1/7

A detailed rebuttal to the film Screw Loose Change- Not Freakin Again Edition.
Note: This critique only addresses the WTC, as many issues about the Pentagon, Shanksville, and the hijackers are geniuely misrepresented in Loose Change. A constructive critique of the entire film can be found here:

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/index.html

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• screw
• loose
• change
• 9/11
• 911
• world
• trade
• center
• south
• north
• tower
• debunking
• debunkers
• truth
• movement
• controlled
• demolition
• thermite
• thermate

[andrewm153351]

Also, using microphones to detect explosions is ridiculous. Explosions have several key characteristics that could only really be detected by seismic evidence.

None were found.

You expect there to not be ANY loud noises when huge buildings are on fire? Also your video of the interview where they pick up "explosions" doesn't imply WHEN it was taken.

And why did the penthouse of wtc7 fall several seconds before the actual collapse? Is THAT how controlled demolitions work?

[PchanStitch]

So...this is a video trying to debunk a video that was made to debunk another video that was made to debunk something else.

This has become a hilarious cycle.

[Lukester15]

@Brett9897 Only just come across this, sorry haha! I know the other side of WTC7 had a lot of smashed glass/windows & fires across what looked like a floor or two, but you have to admit the rest of the building looked undamaged overall? everything else at Ground Zero was obliterated that day, yet WTC7 looked almost pristine in comparison! even if this building also came down in the end

[triptechable]

@dhudson369 I have, long ago. you know he is selling a book right? anyway the easiest way to prove his theory is to go to the site with a Geiger counter. if someone does and the results are off the chart I might believe. instead all he offers is theory in a book you can buy and no evidence. go get a Geiger counter, fuck off to the site and come back to me.

[dhudson369]

@triptechable You need to RESEARCH some more start with Dimitri Khalezov and try opening your mind and abit of common sense

[triptechable]

@dhudson369 NUKE? LOL! You been playing far to much call of duty son.

[dhudson369]

3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911

DEBUNK THAT!

[danbarn72]

Debunking the debunkers! This is so absurd. Attempting to connect the dots with a bunch of non-sequitors and absolute complete nonsense!

[andrewm153351]

@fraze86

Continued-

Also, the demolition you directed me to....

How soon did the top parts fall before the rest of the building? Barely a single second.

The penthouses in wtc7 fell over TEN seconds before the actual collapse.

[andrewm153351]

@fraze86

Lol what a fail.

Did those top parts of the other demolition fall AWAY from the building before collapse? NOPE. They fell straight down, which is NOT how the penthouses fell in wtc7.

Try harder.

[arsenalrule2001uk]

@PchanStitch You're right, but it only appears that way, as many critical thinkers will know, appearances can be deceiving :) There are two arguments, the official conspiracy theory (for those of you that don't properly understand the term) and the alternative theory. Debunkers are nothing more than stealthy counter supporters of the official conspiracy theory. Very important to remember :)

[fraze86]

@andrewm153351

08:45

I rest my case